<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
<%BANNER[banner_468x60_h]%>
<%BANNER[article]%>

Articles: Mainboards

<%BANNER[fp_160x600_r_1]%>
Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 ]

Performance

We chose ABIT KV8-MAX3 mainboard as a reference point for our ECS 755-A2. This Socket754 mainboard from ABIT is based on the VIA K8T800 chipset and is one of the fastest available solutions for the Socket 754 platform. I guess this comparison is a good trial for the new product from ECS.

We used the following testbed:

  • AMD Athlon 64 3000+ CPU;
  • ABIT KV8-MAX3 and ECS 755-A2 mainboards;
  • 1GB DDR400 SDRAM (Corsair CMX512-3200LLPRO, 2 x 512MB, 2-3-2-6);
  • ASUS RADEON 9800 XT graphics card (Catalyst 4.10);
  • RAID0 array of two Western Digital Raptor WD360GD HDDs.

The testbed ran under Microsoft Windows XP SP1; the mainboard BIOSes were set up for the best performance.

The following table lists the benchmarking results in various applications:

 

ABIT KV8-MAX3

ECS 755-A2

Business Winstone 2004

22.9

22.7

Multimedia Content Creation Winstone 2004

29.1

29.1

3DMark03, Default, CPU score

625

634

3DMark03, Default

6455

6441

3DMark2001 SE, Default

19675

19785

Quake3 (four), High Quality, 1024x768x32

363.4

366.7

X2 - The Threat, 1024x768x32

117.39

117.36

Unreal Tournament 2003 (dm-antalus), 1024x768x32

80.73

80.87

Tomb Raider: The Angel of Darkness (paris3), 640x480x32

156.17

157.83

Data Compression, WinRAR 3.3, Best, KB/sec

529

528

Data Compression, 7zip 3.11, 32MB, Compressing

3091

3097

Data Compression, 7zip 3.11, 32MB, Decompressing

2103

2103

MPEG-2 Encoding, Mainconcept MPEG Encoder, sec

235.58

236.31

MPEG-4 Encoding, Xmpeg 5.0/DiVX 5.11, sec

249

249

CINEMA 4D, CINEBENCH 2003, Raytracing, CB

283

283

CINEMA 4D, CINEBENCH 2003, Shading, CB

336

336

CINEMA 4D, CINEBENCH 2003, Lighting SW, CB

1557

1560

CINEMA 4D, CINEBENCH 2003, Lighting HW, CB

3140

3115

PCMark04

4056

4064

PCMark04, CPU

3799

3780

PCMark04, Memory

3581

3591

As you see, the performance level of ECS 755-A2 is high, mostly due to the SiS755 chipset, the fastest chipset for the Athlon 64 today. ECS 755-A2 mainboard is faster than ABIT KV8-MAX3 in most cases, although we have considered ABIT KV8-MAX3 to be the fastest mainboard according to our previous tests.

Conclusion

ECS 755-A2 mainboard we have introduced to you today is the first off-the-shelf product on the new SiS755 chipset for the Athlon 64 processor. Although SiS positions its chipsets as solutions for low-cost mainboards, and ECS 755-A2 is exactly this type of product, the chipset is simply wonderful. We have received another proof of its high speed characteristics. Due to SiS755 Elitegroup engineers built a mainboard with all the features a user expects to see in an inexpensive solution. Good functionality, excellent performance and low pricing distinguish ECS 755-A2 from the competitors.

Thanks to that, ECS 755-A2 may make a good foundation for a system with a junior Athlon 64 (3000+). Again, the kit including this mainboard and processor will cost you less than $300, which is quite an appealing price. Regrettably, ECS 755-A2 is no free from a few drawbacks that result from this very inexpensiveness. The manufacturer was too economical, and mostly at the expense of overclocking options. You get very average results with ECS 755-A2 when overclocking the CPU: you can’t lock AGP/PCI frequencies when increasing the FSB frequency, and you can’t increase the CPU voltage with the standard mainboard options. That’s why I wouldn’t recommend you this mainboard, if you are intending to overclock your CPU.

Highs:

  • Highest performance;
  • High stability;
  • Low price.

Lows:

  • Poor CPU overclocking options;
  • Some drawbacks in the PCB design;
  • Scanty accessories.
Pages: [ 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 ]

<%BANNER[banner_468x60_f]%>

Discussion

Comments currently: 20
Discussion started: 02/25/04 03:11:10 AM
Latest comment: 08/28/08 01:29:44 AM

View comments

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Latest materials in Mainboards section

Article Rating

Article Rating: 9.0000 out of 10
 
Rate this article:
Excellent
Average
Poor