Make Home Page
Add to Favorites
1.
cool, now amd needs dual core semprons
[Posted by: Santa | Date: 10/11/07 05:42:14 PM]
Discussion
Discussion on Article:
Intel Preps Dual-Core Celeron Microprocessors – Documents.
Started by: Santa | Date 10/11/07 05:42:14 PM
Comments: 21 | Last Comment: 02/02/08 10:45:29 AM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads
[1-14]
2.
The deathknell of AMD
The only thing AMD has that low are Sempron and singlecore low end athlons.
The only thing AMD has that low are Sempron and singlecore low end athlons.
[Posted by: Joz | Date: 10/11/07 05:59:58 PM]
3.
Is this true? Am I dreaming a Celeron Dual Core for $35-50?
Now this shall be my main component for my WHS! :D
Now this shall be my main component for my WHS! :D
[Posted by: kadf | Date: 10/11/07 06:48:02 PM]
4.
"The launch of low-cost dual-core Intel Celeron E1000-series processors will cause the chip giant’s rival Advanced Micro Devices to either waterfall prices of its entry-level single-core AMD Athlon LE and AMD Sempron chips, or to introduce value dual-core processors as well and reconsider pricing of single-core offerings."
What do you mean ... you can already get AMD dual core chips for less than 60 bucks today. :) How can they go much cheaper, AMD is losing money on anything less than 65 bucks.
What do you mean ... you can already get AMD dual core chips for less than 60 bucks today. :) How can they go much cheaper, AMD is losing money on anything less than 65 bucks.
[Posted by: JumpingJack | Date: 10/11/07 08:12:10 PM]
5.
I wonder how it would overclock.
If AMD dropped there prices and made x2's in the $40 range that would be sweet too.
Either way this price war/ competition is great for buyers. I mean with all the latest price drop you could really build a sweet system for under $500.
If AMD dropped there prices and made x2's in the $40 range that would be sweet too.
Either way this price war/ competition is great for buyers. I mean with all the latest price drop you could really build a sweet system for under $500.
[Posted by: Jack | Date: 10/11/07 08:13:43 PM]
6.
How about intruction supported? SSE 4? TXT? VT? Please give me at lease SS4 [-o
[Posted by: Hok | Date: 10/11/07 08:33:23 PM]
7.
do people need dual core for less than $65. What does $20 make in difference for a consumer. You run the computer for a month and that's how much you will pay for electricity...
[Posted by: 31415 | Date: 10/12/07 12:13:27 AM]
8.
And why would I want to buy such processors when we already have Pentium E2000 series?
[Posted by: 1234 | Date: 10/12/07 01:14:06 AM]
9.
This is sweet, if true. AMD will have to follow suit. Dual core for $35, budget builders paradise....
[Posted by: krojpi | Date: 10/12/07 03:59:37 AM]
10.
Impressive product diversity
[Posted by: qudos tu intel | Date: 10/12/07 04:35:12 AM]
11.
I'd like to see those celeron dual-core benched against AMD's lowest-priced alternative.
I think that Intel might stuck with so much product that it figures 'what the hell, let's just offer a dual-core celeron'
I think that Intel might stuck with so much product that it figures 'what the hell, let's just offer a dual-core celeron'
[Posted by: zornundo | Date: 10/12/07 06:36:13 AM]
12.
"Intel’s Celeron E1000 dual-core processors are set to be made using 65nm process technology and are projected to fit into 65W thermal design power envelope."
Well, I hope these processors have SpeedStep (EIST)...
Well, I hope these processors have SpeedStep (EIST)...
[Posted by: l33+ne55 | Date: 10/12/07 03:14:06 PM]
13.
Sounds nice except the TDP. A bit odd, in fact, that it's the same TDP as the higher end models, despite having lower clocks and much less cache.
[Posted by: shae | Date: 10/14/07 05:49:09 PM]
14.
What's next you ask? Quad core Celerons!
[Posted by: retard salyer | Date: 02/02/08 10:45:29 AM]
[1-14]
You must log in to add comments.
Unfortunately, the old registrations do not work anymore. Please register again. We apologize for the inconvenience.
Our Sponsors
