<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
<%BANNER[left_160x600_1]%>
<%BANNER[banner_468x60_h]%>

Discussion

<%BANNER[fp_160x600_r_1]%>

Discussion on Article:
Blu-Ray’s Real Battle Is Still Ahead – Analyst Firm.

Started by: Louie | Date 02/20/08 12:06:08 PM
Comments: 10 | Last Comment:  02/21/08 08:40:45 PM

Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-4]

1. 
Why should consumers pay more money for a copy protected format, because that's what all this is about....DRM...no thanks...I'll save my money instead of making Sony richer than it already is.
[Posted by: Louie | Date: 02/20/08 12:06:08 PM]
+ expand thread (2 answers)

2. 
1st I live in australia with a 1.5mb conection with serious dropout issues, How freakin long would it take to download/stream an entire movie. 2nd I bought a ps3 to play games, costs nothing to play online and plays blue ray is a Bonus. Before anyone coments, yes it sucks with dropouts but is infinatly cheaper
[Posted by: Chris | Date: 02/20/08 06:18:56 PM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)

3. 
Did DVD need to fight against VHS 10 yrs ago?

Does it means that Core2Duo has to fight against Pentium3?

So called upscaling techniques implemented in low end devices are using just bluring filters to make ur video smoother but blurer!
[Posted by: Silly | Date: 02/20/08 06:51:41 PM]
+ expand thread (2 answers)

4. 
With the vast majority of plasma/LCD screens in use ATM having around ~ 1366x768 res there is no real PQ benefit using BR and I cant see users dashing out to buy (me included) new 1080p screens AND blu-ray players just for the sake of a slightly better picture

Also the difference in quality between DVD and BR is nothing compared to the huge PQ and audio improvements DVD offered over VHS
[Posted by: alpha0ne | Date: 02/21/08 08:35:03 PM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)

[1-4]

You must log in to add comments.
Unfortunately, the old registrations do not work anymore. Please register again. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me