News

The world’s second largest manufacturer of microprocessors for personal computers, Advanced Micro Devices, reiterated its plans to bring dual-core chips for consumer markets already next year to battle its arch-rival Intel Corp..

AMD Athlon 64, Opteron Get Two Cores

According to a report over Planet3DNow! web-site citing senior AMD executives, AMD put the dual-core AMD Opteron processors into plans for release in the second-half of 2005 and dual-core AMD Athlon 64 chips shortly afterwards, if the market demands. While the intentions of Sunnyvale, California-based chipmaker to introduce dual-core microprocessors have been known for a lot of time now, this is the first time when the firm’s execs officially unveiled the timeframe for the release.

According to some reports, AMD’s dual-core chips will share the L2 cache and HyperTransport bus. It is not unveiled whether the changes to the design of the chips require substantial engineering efforts or slight re-designing of existing offerings will only be needed.

Two Cores from Two Companies

Earlier this month Intel said it had cancelled the development of single-core Pentium 4 and Xeon successors code-named Tejas and Jayhawk in favour of unnamed dual-core chips. The industry analysts believe that the Santa Clara, California-based chipmaker aims to deliver Pentium M-derivatives with two cores, 64-bit capability and other enhancements, such as Vanderpool technology.

Dual-core processors can process two times more data per clock and handle more than one threads at once. This allows the whole system to perform a lot better under high load when running multiply processors.

Exclusive availability of dual-core chips for servers, laptops and desktops could seriously boost Intel’s competitiveness and reduce AMD’s, but after AMD said it planned to enter the same kind of products in approximately the same timeframe, it is clear that both firms will deliver tangibly more powerful chips next year.

Yields Under Question

While dual-core processors typically bring higher computing speed, their die size is also substantially larger compared to single-core microprocessors. As a result, fewer such chips can fit onto one wafer, which means that less such microprocessors may be produced from a single wafer. Furthermore, larger the core is – lower the yield is – likely the chance of its failure during the manufacturing process is.

It was not announced which fabrication process is going to be used to make dual-core microprocessors.

Intel is making chips using 90nm now and aims to start using 65nm fabrication process in late 2005 or early 2006. The die size of the company’s chips is larger compared to that value the rival, however, Intel has a number of fabs to make semiconductors and ramp up the production of dual-core chips in time.

AMD is making processors using 130nm process technology today and plans to start 90nm ramp later this year. The company’s only facility – Fab 30 – is capable of starting around 5000 200mm wafers per week, which may put the company under pressure to produce cost-effective dual-core chips there in 2H 2005. AMD’s Fab 36 that will use 300mm wafers and 65nm process technology will go online in 2006.

Discussion

Comments currently: 6
Discussion started: 05/22/04 04:27:51 PM
Latest comment: 06/14/04 08:54:53 PM

[1-6]

1. 
I don't know about you, but I'm thinking for reasons that will just not be apparent till they happen, that AMD won't really be on time with this one. Like every delay of the past, they won't really get this into the market till 2006, and they won't tell you that till mid 2005.

If you think dual core is going to be a significant benefit to you, I'm thinking Intel is the only real one to deliver it in 2005. I'm sure not all will agree, but I see AMD being both late and, if they base the dual cores off 90nm, they will be very $$$ too. Intel won't be cheap, it'll just be cheapER.

I think this is a release, with no real ability to do it behind it.

Just imo :)
[Posted by: Anemone  | Date: 05/22/04 04:27:51 PM]

2. 
Yes, Thats what we were waiting for. Both the chipmakers turning towards dual-core processors means that consumers are really king now. All we really need now is a good OS which can start flying with these silicon suckers. I wrote about me purchasing a Dual-Core Processor in 1 to 1 1/2 years timeframe on a Indian Tech/news site "ChannelTimes.com" in regards to story "Intel withdrawing 2.0GHz and pushing Prescott" and I was laughed upon. But I guess I had some views as I frequented your amazing site for news.
[Posted by: Harshal  | Date: 05/22/04 08:46:19 PM]

3. 
2005 is too far out, they will drop the 2 core cpu by then
[Posted by: monkey joe  | Date: 05/23/04 09:36:00 AM]

4. 
Dual-core, pfeh. What you're likely going to see is that instead of giving you a 3 GHz processor, you get one with two 1.5 GHz cores. Sure, that one application that you're using that is multi-threaded will benefit, but all your others will suffer.

Don't buy into the hype. Dual-core won't be beneficial on the desktop for a long time to come.
[Posted by: Yuri  | Date: 05/23/04 10:03:22 AM]

5. 
Just thinking....
I know processors design is too complex, but why they don’t double the INTEGER and FPU unit's? I think AMD have 3 FPU and Intel 2, so why they don’t double it? Too difficult?

Just "robbing" the idea from Ati and Nvidia.
[Posted by: I  | Date: 05/25/04 10:39:39 AM]

6. 
AMD will absolutely be on target with this. What's more is that with the efficient scaling of added memory controllers and using coherent HT will allow any programs, not just multi-threaded ones, to benefit from dual-core designs. As an added benefit, SMT and a larger L2 may be thrown into the mix. Let Intel be wary!
[Posted by: Binary  | Date: 06/14/04 08:54:53 PM]

[1-6]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Saturday, November 7, 2009

3:28 pm | Electronic Book Industry Set to Explode in 2010 – Analysts. E-Book Industry Set to Raise – MIC

1:31 pm | Intel Plans “Fast” Transition to Next-Generation Atom Platform. Intel to Reveal More Details About Pine Trail Platform on December 21

11:27 am | Prices of SSDs Will Get Closer to Hard Drives in Three to Five Years – Chief Executive of OCZ. SSDs Set to Become Much More Affordable in the Future

Friday, November 6, 2009

11:56 am | Microsoft Windows 7 Appears to Be More Popular in Retail than Vista Back in 2007. First Week Windows 7 Sales Surpass Sales of Windows Vista in First Week – Research Firm

9:30 am | Elpida and ProMOS Sign “Technology-for-Capacity” Pact. Elpida to Outsource Production of DRAM to ProMOS