<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
<%BANNER[banner_468x60_h]%>
<%BANNER[article]%>

News

<%BANNER[fp_160x600_r_1]%>

Intel Corp. on Monday officially updated its price-list by including its recently released Intel Core 2 central processing units (CPUs) and also reduced the pricing on certain of its microprocessors. As a result of the dramatic reduction, a quad-core processor from the world’s largest chipmaker now costs just like its dual-core brethren in business quantities.

Intel’s quad-core desktop Core 2 Quad Q6600, Xeon 3220 and Xeon 3210 saw their prices plummeted by 47% - 50%, a rather unprecedented price slash in the recent history. Other price reductions were not as dramatic: from 4% to 15%.

Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 and Xeon 3220 chips run at 2.40GHz, come with 8MB L2 cache and uses 1066MHz processor system bus (PSB). The processors are sold by Intel Corp. at $266 in 1000-unit quantities, whereas Intel Core 2 Duo E6850 (3.00GHz, 8MB, 1333MHz PSB) and E6600 (2.40GHz, 8MB cache, 1066MHz PSB) dual-core processors are sold for $266 and $244. Intel Xeon 3210 (2.13GHz) chip for single-processor configurations is available at $224, while Intel Core 2 Duo E6400/6420 at 2.13GHz cost $183. It should be noted Intel Xeon chips require motherboards that recognize those chips.

While the Core 2 Duo E6850 operates at higher clock-speed and will be slightly faster in applications that take advantage of two cores (or rely on one core only), the Core 2 Quad Q6600 is likely to be more efficient in future applications that heavily rely on execution of several threads simultaneously.

In fact, the price-point and similarity of specifications are likely to catalyze more computer makers and end-users to choose the CPU with four cores instead of a chip with two cores, which will further encourage software makers to tweak their software for multi-core processors. At least, this seems to be a reason why Intel decided to slash the price of its quad-core products by as much as 50%.

<%BANNER[banner_468x60_f]%>

Related news

Discussion

<%BANNER[fp_160x600_r_2]%>
Comments currently: 10
Discussion started: 07/23/07 11:03:22 AM
Latest comment: 07/26/07 04:54:23 AM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-5]

1. 
sweet!
[Posted by: yj | Date: 07/23/07 11:03:22 AM]

2. 
yah.. sweet... AMD gets another kick in the crouch...
[Posted by: dudde | Date: 07/23/07 11:14:34 AM]

3. 
Conroes dont have 8 MB of L2, but 4 MB. Small typo bout in the middle of the article.
[Posted by: 1234 | Date: 07/23/07 12:24:48 PM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)

4. 
*intel : We pwnzor AMD

*amd: LOL noob netburst

*intel: Lol WE GOT CORE!!! LOLOL!

*amd: shit...um.. 3ghz ATHLON x2!!!!!!!!

*intel: noobs, QUAD CORE!!!!!!

*amd: lol 4x4!!!!!!

*intel: laugh

*amd : WE NEED $$$$$$$$$$

*intel: $266 QUAD CORE!!!!

*intel: owned

*amd: *crying*
[Posted by: Joz | Date: 07/23/07 06:28:30 PM]
+ expand thread (3 answers)

5. 
Still not cheap.
[Posted by: Stalker | Date: 07/26/07 04:54:23 AM]

[1-5]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Latest News

Monday, October 6, 2008

9:26 pm | Nvidia Plans Another Re-Branding of Graphics Cards. Nvidia’s GeForce 9 to Become Nvidia GeForce GT, GTS

7:52 pm | Intel: Core i7 to Be Up to 52% Faster Compared to Core 2 Quad. Intel Predicts Massive Performance Improvements with New Chips

4:55 pm | Kingston to Join the SSD Market. The Company to Sell SSDs by Intel

4:51 pm | Sega Preparing a Portable Gaming Console – Rumor. One More Competitor for Sony

4:48 pm | Elpida Completes Development of 65nm Chip Shrink. Enhances Cost Competitiveness and Manufacturing Flexibility