Intel Corp. said on Tuesday that it would start production of its new central processing units (CPUs) using new 45nm process technology in late October, less than two months from now. Following the formal opening, the world’s largest chipmaker will unveil new and faster processors in mid-November, a move expected to rise performance bar of computing.
“In 45 days, a new building called ‘Fab 32’ tucked into a sleepy corner of Arizona will come to life. Inside this building a new type of device will be made in incredible numbers,” said Nick Knupffer, a spokesman for Intel wrote in the company’s corporate blog.
Earlier Intel started making its central processing units using 45nm process tech at its development D1D fab in Oregon, however, the development fab cannot manufacture products in high-volume, which is required for mass products.
Intel’s 45nm fabrication process is an innovative production technology that features new Hafnium material with a property called high-k for the transistor gate dielectric, and a new combination of metal materials for the transistor gate electrode. The combination of thinner process technology along with new materials is projected to reduce transistor leakage and increases their performance.
The Santa Clara, California-based chipmaker is projected to ship its first server and high-performance desktop/workstation microprocessors made using 45nm process technology for revenue this year and even formally unveil it late in 2007 too. Potentially, the new 45nm central processing units represent a threat for the new breed of chips from Advanced Micro Devices, who is known for relatively slow volume ramps of its innovative chips.
Intel announced in March that the new “Penryn” family chips produced using 45nm process technology will have greater instructions per clock (IPC) execution, which means that they will be faster and more efficient even at the same clock-speeds with the current generation chips. Besides, the new chips will be able to run at higher clock-speeds compared to today’s Core 2 Duo and Core 2 Quad products.
The major micro-architectural improvements for new Intel Core 2 processors, besides SSE4 instruction set, include the so-called Unique Super Shuffle Engine and Radix 16 technique. The Super Shuffle Engine is a full-width, single-pass shuffle unit that is 128-bits wide, which can perform full-width shuffles in a single cycle. This significantly improves performance for SSE2, SSE3 and SSE4 instructions that have shuffle-like operations such as pack, unpack and wider packed shifts. This feature will increase performance for content creation, imaging, video and high-performance computing. Radix 16 technique, according to Intel, roughly doubles the divider speed over previous generations for computations used in nearly all applications. In addition, Intel also improved virtualization technology as well as added some features to dynamic acceleration technology, which is supposed to boost single-threaded applications’ performance on multi-core chips.
Each of Intel’s dual-core Penryn chips will have 410 million transistors, up significantly from 291 million of current dual-core Conroe processors, however, thanks to 45nm process technology, the chips will have die size of 107 square millimeters, down about 25% from 155 square millimeters of the Conroe.
Comments currently: 14
Discussion started: 09/12/07 10:47:44 AM
Latest comment: 10/14/07 05:13:16 PM
Expand all threads |
Collapse all threads
[1-6]
1.
Let's hope the Penryn doesn't turn out to be the new Prescott.
[Posted by: tech | Date: 09/12/07 10:47:44 AM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)
- collapse thread
well, shrinking to a smaller manufacturing process will definitely help in the reduction of power consumption. Let's hope that their tauted high-K material will deliver as promised.
manufacturing in 45nm will allow them to reduce production cost and continue with their price war...
[Posted by: dudde | Date: 09/12/07 12:01:21 PM]
2.
Cutting costs and increasing profit and marketshare. That is all Intel cares about.
Intel simply doesn't care about the end user.
That is precisely why I'll be looking elsewhere next time I upgrade.
[Posted by: tech | Date: 09/12/07 12:25:35 PM]
+ expand thread (6 answers)
- collapse thread
Who does care about end user? AMD? If they did, they would deliver a product that would at least perform. The only spot where AMD can compete at is price, and thanks to the die shrink, Intel will now be more aggressive than ever.
[Posted by: Mr. BonBon | Date: 09/12/07 02:05:27 PM]
you do have a weird logic....
what does die shrink have to do with a company caring for end users??!
processing shrinking is all about innovation...
What's your point??
Here's what your trying to point out:
Intel moves to 45nm processing.... therefore, Intel doesn't care about end users.
In mid-2008, AMD will move to 45nm processing.... therefore, AMD wiil not care about end users.
Where do you buy your reasoning??!?
[Posted by: dudde | Date: 09/12/07 07:30:51 PM]
I think that he means that Intel will produce the chips at a lower price point, and sell them at the previous one, thus increasing their profit margin. This is not NOT caring about the consumer; this is normal market practice. In an oligopolystic market the companies do not have to care about the consumer.
[Posted by: 31415 | Date: 09/13/07 05:28:03 PM]
it's the same thing for AMD or any other electronic company that has to go thru the process of improving their fabrication, there objective is to increase yields, cut down cost, and get a better profit margin.
For consumers, regardless of which of these companies you patronize, moving to a better fabrication technology means we get to choose and buy cooler, more efficient chips.
so if you look at what he meant, he is just bashing on Intel for being the first to move to 45nm. Its a typical fanboyish behavior... if the article's title were "AMD to Start Volume Production of 45nm chips in 45 days", I'm pretty sure he'll comment on a different way.
[Posted by: dudde | Date: 09/13/07 10:40:39 PM]
I care about AMD. I really do. I love AMD.
[Posted by: Mr. BonBon | Date: 09/14/07 06:59:20 PM]
Well, starting 45nm production using an innovative process simply means better products which means that new products will capture the higher price points and hence the current products will move to lower level price points. Thus the consumer WILL have better products at lower price points available than what is available currently. How this is not benefitting the consumer is something that is quite beyond me.
[Posted by: ar | Date: 10/14/07 05:13:16 PM]
3.
If it were not for AMD and their superior products, we'd all be slaves to Intel and still using Pentium 90 CPUs costing $1,000. Anyone who wants the best performance and choice would be wise to buy AMD. Intel talks a lot of shitze but they would screw their mother for a dime.
[Posted by: Jorge | Date: 09/12/07 07:40:24 PM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)
- collapse thread
superior products?!?
well K8 was good back in those days... but then again... those were the days...
AMD nowadays is hardly innovative... R600 was mediocre in performance.... and so is the over-hyped Barcelona.. No wonder, AMD couldn't release actual benchmarks early on... its because they couldn't deliver on what they were bragging as 40% increase in performance...
well I choose performance regardless of company... with the current price war and intel going to a smaller production... they can afford to still reduce prices... better for us...
I don't see the point of blindly adhering to a company that hardly can deliver nowadays...
[Posted by: dudde | Date: 09/12/07 09:10:31 PM]
4.
Nice! I am sitting pretty with my Q6600 @ 3.6GHz and 2Gig of DDR2.
I guess I'll wait till Intel's desktop CPUs with 1600MHz FSB come out and buy a quad version of those chips along with the fastest DDR3 kits.
I am extremely happy with my G0 Q6600.
3600MHz quad core for $266!That's frigging 1200MHz overclock!!
[Posted by: No Sheep | Date: 09/13/07 01:43:03 AM]
5.
A step forward to 45nm architecture and fabrication technology. After that in 2008, Intel will make its first native quad-core processor which includes integrated MCH and using CSI technology developed by itself.
Shall see what clock can 45nm CPU can give if overclocked
[Posted by: Tangent | Date: 09/13/07 03:34:28 AM]
6.
If you read that article carefully, you will find in between the lines that Intel intends to put AMD out of business, for real this time.
The price cut that is coming with the 45nm parts are going to be the brutalest the CPU world has ever seen. AMD will be bleeding billions a quarter and liquidated in 2008.
Can you say $150 quad core for the desktop?
AMD is dead, and their sales bosses knows it and is jumping off the sinking shit.
[Posted by: caesar | Date: 09/14/07 01:31:43 PM]
[1-6]