News

The dual-processor enthusiast-class code-named Skulltrail platform from Intel, which the company demonstrated at Intel Developer Forum, will be available in Q1 2008. But while the new extreme gaming machines will offer outstanding performance, they will come at a price with only central processing units (CPUs) costing $3000.

Intel’s Skulltrail platform for gamers based on code-named Seaburg chipset resembles Stoakley platform for high-end dual-processor workstations, but in addition to features like support for two quad-core microprocessors with up to 1600MHz processor system bus, up to 128GB of PC2-6400 (800MHz) FB-DIMM memory, Intel virtualization technology and other capabilities, the Skulltrail offers four PCI Express x16 slots for graphics cards to support 4-way CrossFire or SLI multi-GPU configurations.

Intel plans to release special versions of Intel Core 2 Extreme processors in LGA771 form-factor to power its dual-socket enthusiast platform, confidential documents seen by X-bit labs claim. The first of such chips will be Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9775 clocked at 3.20GHz with overspeed protection disabled (unlocked multiplier), the new chip will utilize 1600MHz processor system bus and feature 12MB cache. Given that the newcomer is made using 45nm process technology, it will sport all the advantages that the new code-named Penryn family has. The new extreme chips from Intel will have thermal design power of 150W, therefore, will need very efficient and potentially noisy and/or expensive cooling systems.

It is currently known that Intel will offer Intel D5400XS motherboard for Skulltrail systems, but it is unclear whether large mainboard makers, such as Asustek Computer, will also offer a Skulltrail platform.

But those, who demand to have eight processing engines under the hood of their gaming station will have to pay a price for that. Each Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9775 will cost $1499 in business quantities, meaning that end-users will have to pay over $3000 for processors alone. Dual-socket mainboards for workstations typically cost from $300 to $550, whereas high-end graphics cards usually retail for $399 and upwards. Typically, high-end systems also use high-performance hard disk drives, such as Western Digital Raptor X 150GB, in addition to high-capacity HDDs, such as Seagate Barracuda 1TB, which are also not really affordable. As a result, gamers will have to pay roughly $6000 only for critical components, such as two Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9775, 4GB of memory, 4 graphics cards, one high-speed HDD and one high-capacity HDD. Given that monitor, case, power supply, optical drive, workmanship, various software and so on also do not come for free, Intel Skulltrail gaming stations will easily pass $10 000 milestone.

Intel did not comment on the news-story.

Discussion

Comments currently: 20
Discussion started: 10/12/07 05:49:41 AM
Latest comment: 01/10/08 04:39:54 AM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-13]

1. 
*lol* this stuff is LETHAL =)
[Posted by: 1234  | Date: 10/12/07 05:49:41 AM]

2. 
LMFAO at $1500 per cpu!!!

Is anybody really gonna buy this thing?
[Posted by: zornundo  | Date: 10/12/07 07:00:07 AM]
+ expand thread (2 answers)

3. 
Meh, thats just plain crazy...
I was thinking more in the lines of buy a quad core normal cpu, and add one later on whene the price drops and do the same thing with the graphic cards
Hell guess ill rather go for a normal system...
[Posted by: Eddi  | Date: 10/12/07 08:59:03 AM]

4. 
This is simply overkill for gaming alone. There's no game in the next two years that will utilize this power probably, so at least in that respect, this system should be future proof, at least the CPU's.

But then again Nelaham, Penryn's sucessor will be out in Q3 2008, with 8 cores on one chip anyway.

Nelham will be my next poison.
[Posted by: Heatlesssun  | Date: 10/12/07 10:03:46 AM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)

5. 
Yeah early adopting this is dumb, unless you make $100,000+ a year and don't care about wasting money =D

1 year from now we'll be able to build octa (8) core computers for only $2000 or less..... Will 8 cores even show an improvement in any applications or games? Probably, but is 4 cores enough for now? Absolutely.


Intell is releasing this for braggin rights only.
[Posted by: gamebro  | Date: 10/12/07 11:48:21 AM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)

6. 
Are you sure about the LGA775 socket for skulltrail? This is bad news for me. I was waiting for a decent dual socket, overclocking friendly, Xeon motherboard for quite a while and I thight my wish had come true. Now it seems that they are just going to use their Extreme series quad core processors for this (with the possibility of also using and Core 2 processors?) system and not Xeons. SUCKS! My 5050s are going to go to waste :(
[Posted by: Taracta  | Date: 10/12/07 12:24:47 PM]

7. 
This is not dumb or insane. Having 8 cores and 4 Nvidia graphic cards is possible thanks to the technological innovation and advancements at Intel. If you have the money... why not? If you don't too bad. Hey, there are people who might want to run Crysis @2560*1600 with 4AA and this would not be possible with one or two 8800GTX. (I won't even mention the junk ATI cards).
[Posted by: Mr. BonBon  | Date: 10/12/07 03:35:10 PM]
+ expand thread (3 answers)

8. 
Windows Vista can not handle more than two video cards, so the system is already a waste even if the price does not push (rich) users away. Linux can handle multiple video cards easily. Intel Core 2 Duo never needs high performance RAM such as FB-DIMM. FB-DIMM do not perform well. They just consume more power.
[Posted by: linuxnerd  | Date: 10/13/07 03:15:43 AM]

9. 
Wow, I think i'll just stick with my 6000 and Celerons for the future. This is nice for those who don't mind spending the money, since finally they'll be getting the systems they always wanted.
[Posted by: nuff  | Date: 10/13/07 01:35:29 PM]

10. 
Grab an Intel quad core w/ dual 8800 GTX and you'll be fine for a while.
I'm personally going to wait to get this when its oct core on one chip.
Remember people at one later point in time, this is going to be considered SLOW.
[Posted by: KC  | Date: 10/14/07 03:24:53 PM]

11. 
pricing surely will anger many users. CPU's are almost worthless year later
[Posted by: muzzle8410  | Date: 10/15/07 02:42:40 PM]

12. 
Ouch, beating AMD again at their own game. The price of this system will probably come down when AMD launches their own 8 core setup. Of course AMD better do it fast before Intel goes out with 16 core setup, and of course knowing Intel you will need to buy a new dual socket motherboard ^_^.
[Posted by: Megamanx00  | Date: 10/15/07 03:48:31 PM]

13. 
If Intel truely cared about making an all-out gamer board, it would be LGA 775, and use DDR3, not just a revamped server board. From everything I have read, FB-DIMMs suck, end of story. Why build such a board? Because there will never be a volume of purchases to drive the price down., in other words, pure profit hunting. What a waste.
[Posted by: kabalah70  | Date: 01/10/08 04:39:54 AM]

[1-13]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Saturday, November 7, 2009

3:28 pm | Electronic Book Industry Set to Explode in 2010 – Analysts. E-Book Industry Set to Raise – MIC

1:31 pm | Intel Plans “Fast” Transition to Next-Generation Atom Platform. Intel to Reveal More Details About Pine Trail Platform on December 21

11:27 am | Prices of SSDs Will Get Closer to Hard Drives in Three to Five Years – Chief Executive of OCZ. SSDs Set to Become Much More Affordable in the Future

Friday, November 6, 2009

11:56 am | Microsoft Windows 7 Appears to Be More Popular in Retail than Vista Back in 2007. First Week Windows 7 Sales Surpass Sales of Windows Vista in First Week – Research Firm

9:30 am | Elpida and ProMOS Sign “Technology-for-Capacity” Pact. Elpida to Outsource Production of DRAM to ProMOS