News

Advanced Micro Devices on Friday admitted that it would only begin shipments of products made using 45nm process technology in the fourth quarter of the year. This is a delay from the original schedule to start “volume” production by mid-2008, besides it also means that AMD will have uneasy times delivering better products to the market in Q2 and Q3, 2008.

“We’ll start the production ramp in the summertime and start to ship products in volume in Q4 2008,” said Dirk Meyer, president and chief operating officer at AMD during a conference call with financial analysts.

Back in mid-2006 another high-ranking executive at AMD – Daryl Ostrander, senior vice president and manufacturing and technology, showcased a presentation to investors and financial analysts where he indicated that AMD’s Fab 36 was on-track for volume 45nm production by mid-2008, one and a half years after 65nm and about half a year later than Intel Corp., which started revenue shipments of 45nm products in late 2007.

Historically AMD came with new process technologies about a year later than Intel, but in many cases it did not have any problems with that: the company had superior processor micro-architecture at the days of 130nm, 90nm and 65nm nodes and could offer higher-performance products despite of relatively outdated process technology. But these days AMD cannot boast with clearly superior products and it crucially needs to transit its quad-core AMD Opteron and AMD Phenom processors to thinner process technology to boost performance. Without higher speed products the world’s second largest maker of x86 central processing unit will continue to suffer from pressure of Intel’s superior processor family particularly in Q2 and Q3 2008.

Besides revealing information about the start of volume shipments of the first-generation 45nm products, AMD also said that its next-generation G3 server platform along with octa-core chip code-named Montreal is scheduled to be released in late 2009 or even early 2010.

“We’ll be introducing a new [server] platform architecture later 2009, early 2010,” Mr. Meyer said.

Discussion

Comments currently: 31
Discussion started: 04/21/08 10:12:22 AM
Latest comment: 04/23/08 09:24:45 PM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-10]

1. 
AMD = Another Motherf***ing Delay
[Posted by: tired of this  | Date: 04/21/08 10:12:22 AM]
+ expand thread (6 answers)

2. 
AMD timelines and roadmap announcements lost all credibility some time ago.
[Posted by: EndPCNoise  | Date: 04/21/08 11:21:44 AM]

3. 
i agree with all of the above, it is really hard to keep oneself excited about any "coming soon" product from AMD.
[Posted by: Me, expressing myself  | Date: 04/21/08 11:35:21 AM]

4. 
We will believe you AMD when you get your products out in the market!
[Posted by: AMD Suckers United  | Date: 04/21/08 11:46:20 AM]

5. 
Back in 2006: Volume 45nm production by MID-2008

Today: Start production Summer 2008, shipping volume Q4 2008.

My thoughts:
- Summer does fall into MID-2008...
- If you really want to nit-pick, they were MAYBE off by a month or two when they made the statement OVER two years ago.
- AMD will have 6 (native) and 12 (2 x 6) core CPUs for early 2009. Then they can phase into 8 core with new generation
[Posted by: mamisano  | Date: 04/21/08 02:06:20 PM]
+ expand thread (5 answers)

6. 
Always Making Deceits.


I call b.s. on AMD.



BULLSHIT!
[Posted by: Joz  | Date: 04/21/08 02:24:08 PM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)

7. 
Oh God, It just wreaks of shit in here. There is no scent of intelligence in here. I just love the smell of AMD bashing in the morning. /sarcasm

Help, I need a bio-suit.

Yes AMD is in the shits as of now in terms of big money losses, poor intro and performance of products, late releases, and other stuff it is paddling around in.

But oh wow, people these days don't know hot to fucking think before they open their traps. Especially when it comes to issues like this. I wouldn't be surprised if the same people here were bashing on Intel during the netBurst years and when AMD had the performance crown.

Christ . . . I just have to love tech-related bashings, it never gets old.

People, get some IQ points. Be careful, you might slip in your shits.

(Yes, I am very pissed off about this AMD bashing that goes on ever since the Core era started.)
[Posted by: RtFusion  | Date: 04/21/08 08:53:21 PM]
+ expand thread (9 answers)

8. 
To the writer/editor:

In the fourth paragraph you state that AMD was competitive against Intel at 65nm. While yes, the 90nm A64s were better than 65nm Cedarmill, AMD was hardly competitive by the the time they released their own 65nm parts.

To all: As for the slow ramp, This is bad for AMD but, it is not lethal. Intel, OTOH, is taking its' time because they are on top. Under pressure, they could have had masses of chips out months ago.

BTW: My comp got stolen yesterday. B-(
[Posted by: cheeseman  | Date: 04/21/08 09:18:06 PM]

9. 
since amd said that they will start volume production
by mid 2008, there s nothing wrong with the fact that the products will be shipped a few month later, as it take at least two month to
build a processor..
[Posted by: abw  | Date: 04/22/08 09:51:52 AM]

10. 
ummm...
"This is a delay from the original schedule to start “volume” production by mid-2008"

volume production in mid 2008 means that you can't possibly deliver before Q4...it takes 3 months to produce a chip.
[Posted by: vid  | Date: 04/23/08 06:52:07 AM]

[1-10]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Friday, July 3, 2009

5:50 pm | Apple Reminds: iPhone and iPod Overheat at 35 Degrees Celcius. Apple Issues Warning Concerning Overheating

1:09 pm | Former Intel’s Chief Does Not Expect Quick Results from Intel-Nokia Pact. Feasibility of Intel’s and Nokia’s Partnership to Be Clear in Several Years

9:15 am | Nvidia's Chief Executive Publicly Unveils Pricing of "Ion" Core-Logic. Nvidia’s Ion Platform Appears to Be Up to Three Times More Expensive than Intel’s

Thursday, July 2, 2009

11:42 pm | Transcend Equips Memory Modules with Thermal Sensors. Transcend's New Memory Modules Can Monitor Their Temperature

10:17 pm | AMD Will Not Support Nvidia's CUDA Technology. AMD Not Interested in Supporting Nvidia's CUDA

3:46 pm | Sony Claims that UMD-Less PlayStation Portable Was Always In The Plans. Sony's Claims Raises Question Whether UMD Ever Was a Compulsory Element of PSP

12:43 pm | DDR3 to Capture 30% of the Market by Year End - DRAMeXchange. Contract DDR3 Prices to Increase in July