News

Advanced Micro Devices plans to return its premium class FX-series processors to the market sometime in the middle of next year. The question is whether the new central processing units (CPUs) will truly be capable of successfully competing against rivals.

AMD Athlon 64 FX processors were first release back in 2003 to address the market of computer enthusiasts and gamers, however, when Advanced Micro Devices lost its performance crown on the x86 chip market in 2006, the firm had to cease production of “FX” parts since they were not competitive against Intel Corp.’s products. There were no new “FX” chips in 2007 and in 2008, but AMD hopes that in mid-2009 the “FX” will return.

The code-named Deneb FX microprocessors that are projected to be launched sometime in the middle of next year will feature four processing engines, shared level-three cache, dual-channel DDR2 (up to PC2-8500, 1066MHz) and DDR3 (up to PC3-10666, 1333MHz) memory controller, according to sources with knowledge of AMD’s plans. The new chips are projected to utilize AM3 form-factor, which means better system flexibility.

Precise specifications of AMD Phenom FX chips based on Deneb FX core are unknown, however, specs of AMD’s first 45nm microprocessors for desktops include 2.80GHz and 3.0GHz chips, which means that the FX products will operate at higher clock-speeds, bringing higher performance to the market.

It is crucial for AMD to increase frequencies of the Deneb FX chips considerably in order to attract attention of performance enthusiasts, who can pay $1000 per CPU provided that they get unbeatable performance. Currently AMD’s chips cannot provide unrivalled speed, which is why the company has to concentrate on mainstream and entry-level microprocessors, which means that the company’s profit margins are lower than they used to be.

AMD did not comment on the news-story.

Tags: AMD, Phenom, Deneb, 45nm

Discussion

Comments currently: 3
Discussion started: 09/02/08 08:37:51 PM
Latest comment: 10/23/08 01:54:40 AM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-2]

1. 
Even @ 3.0GHz a cheap q9400 will perform and especially OC way beyond anything the FX could ever hope for so unless they sell the FX for under $300 no one in their right mind would buy it

Sad but AMD really need to improve performance big time to catch Intel this time
[Posted by: alpha0ne  | Date: 09/02/08 08:37:51 PM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)

2. 
^ yea dude do ur research b4 posting such baseless claims...
[Posted by: PFX  | Date: 10/23/08 01:54:40 AM]

[1-2]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Saturday, November 7, 2009

3:28 pm | Electronic Book Industry Set to Explode in 2010 – Analysts. E-Book Industry Set to Raise – MIC

1:31 pm | Intel Plans “Fast” Transition to Next-Generation Atom Platform. Intel to Reveal More Details About Pine Trail Platform on December 21

11:27 am | Prices of SSDs Will Get Closer to Hard Drives in Three to Five Years – Chief Executive of OCZ. SSDs Set to Become Much More Affordable in the Future

Friday, November 6, 2009

11:56 am | Microsoft Windows 7 Appears to Be More Popular in Retail than Vista Back in 2007. First Week Windows 7 Sales Surpass Sales of Windows Vista in First Week – Research Firm

9:30 am | Elpida and ProMOS Sign “Technology-for-Capacity” Pact. Elpida to Outsource Production of DRAM to ProMOS