<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
<%BANNER[banner_468x60_h]%>
<%BANNER[article]%>

News

After years of providing premium chipsets for AMD Athlon family of processors NVIDIA Corp. has finally gained license to make core-logic products for central processing units by Intel Corp.. Even though not a lot of details are known currently, given Intel’s wide range of products, NVIDIA may significantly enhance its positions as a chipset designer.

The companies said they had signed a broad, multi-year patent cross-license agreement spanning multiple product lines and product generations. Additionally, the companies signed a multi-year chipset agreement for NVIDIA to license Intel’s front-side bus technology. This will enable NVIDIA to deliver its NVIDIA nForce platform technology on Intel-based systems.

“NVIDIA’s product portfolio offers exciting technology options to Intel customers, including our NVIDIA nForce platform and PCI Express-based SLI graphics technology solution,” said Jen-Hsun Huang, president and chief executive officer of NVIDIA Corp.

During the Q3 2004 Intel Corp. supplied 62.1% of all chipsets shipped worldwide, VIA Technologies commanded 18.5% of the market, Silicon Integrated Systems Corp. shipped 9.9% of core-logic products in Q3 2004, while ATI Technologies and NVIDIA Corp. only occupied 4.5% and 4.2% of the market.

NVIDIA was the only chipset designer who did not have rights to produce products aimed at microprocessors from Intel Corp. Historically NVIDIA targeted high-end of AMD CPU market, currently NVIDIA Corp. is the only provider of chipsets capable of using two graphics cards in parallel – NVIDIA nForce4 SLI. With license for Intel’s Quad Pumped Bus NVIDIA may expand its product line with desktop and workstation oriented products.

The agreement with Intel Corp. can not only give a boost to NVIDIA’s revenues, but also put some pressure on sales of other chipset designers, primarily VIA Technologies, Silicon Integrated Systems, who have been concentrating on desktop chipsets, and partly ATI Technologies, who so far has been focusing on mobile core-logic products. Intel’s high-end chipset business may also face attack from NVIDIA.

NVIDIA Corp. did not elaborate on actual products or their timeframes.

<%BANNER[banner_468x60_f]%>

Discussion

Comments currently: 5
Discussion started: 11/19/04 09:08:19 AM
Latest comment: 11/22/04 03:18:50 AM

[1-5]

1. 
"currently NVIDIA Corp. is the only provider of chipsets capable of using two graphics cards in parallel – NVIDIA nForce4 SLI"

"...the only provider of mainstream desktop chipsets" would be more accurate. There is still intel's tumwater chipset
[Posted by: Nada | Date: 11/19/04 09:08:19 AM]

2. 
A superb move on Nvidia's part, imo. It will improve their breadth of experience as well as give them new market opportunities. This will improve the competition in the Intel chipset arena as well, and will, I expect, be an incredible boon to "enthusiasts" as well.

Anyone want to bet that Lake and Glen sets in '05 don't have OC locks? hehe

Have to love competition...
[Posted by: Anemone | Date: 11/19/04 09:14:57 AM]

3. 
A superb move on Nvidia's part ?

Its the only move they could make! They had no choice but to pay Intel's high licensing fees! Why do you think its taken 4 generations later for an NForce chipset to come to an Intel platform!

At least those of us with multiple setups can have an Nforce powered AMD and Intel setup...

I look forward to a Pentium-M mobo from either DFI or AOpen using Nforce chipset...That would be cool. (We all know P4 and P-M chipsets are no different execept for a few electricals which can be overcome...As it will be shown by DFI and AOpen with their i915 based mobos for P-M that's coming).
[Posted by: ae3 | Date: 11/19/04 05:13:00 PM]

4. 
Actually they could have just ridden the wave of A64 as it grew, but that is, admittedly, not growing fast. I tend to think they had business options that didn't include going into the Intel business at all. You're saying it's taken 4 generations to show they had no choice but to pay? Of course they had to pay, that much is a given. My remark was regarding the choice to enter the market at all, which I think they avoided from a business decision beyond just pricing of the licensing fees.

Anyway, you agree though that its a good thing?

:)
[Posted by: Anemone | Date: 11/20/04 06:50:06 AM]

5. 
The more the merrier!

According to The Inquirer, Nvidia now may not have to pay a cent to Intel! (for the first year of the licencing agreement)
=> http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=19791
[Posted by: ae3 | Date: 11/22/04 03:18:50 AM]

[1-5]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Thursday, January 8, 2009

10:12 pm | AMD Cuts Price of ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 Graphics Card. ATI Reduces Pricing of Flagship Graphics Card to $449

3:04 pm | Sony Releases Its First Netbook Computer – Vaio P-Series. Sony Launches World’s Slimmest Notebook

11:44 am | Skype Enables VoIP Service on Hundreds of Mobile Phones. Skype Now Available for Java, Android Handset Platforms

9:27 am | AMD Lets the Dragon Out, Releases Phenom II Processors . AMD Intros Its Fastest Desktop Microprocessor Ever with the Phenom II Launch

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

11:24 pm | Intel Reconsiders Financial Results for Q4 for the Second Time. Intel Further Lowers Q4 Expectations

11:08 pm | One Laptop per Child Foundation Cuts Staff, Refocuses Mission. OLPC Faces Tough Economic Times

3:42 pm | Lenovo Reportedly Prepares for Restructuring. Lenovo Blames Reliance on Corporate Customers for Low Market Share

12:47 pm | U.S. Authorities Okay Creation of The Foundry Company. Committee on Foreign Investment Clears Path for Creation of “The Foundry Company”