<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
<%BANNER[banner_468x60_h]%>
<%BANNER[article]%>

News

Via Technologies, a struggling designer of chipsets and central processing units (CPUs), has again reassured its corporate strategy directions and denied earlier reported plans concerning possible split of the company into several units. Meanwhile, the situation with cross-licensing deal with Intel, a crucially important business agreement for Via, remains unclear.

After the most-recent restructuring, Via Technologies consists of three core business groups: CPU Platform, System Platform and MCE (Multimedia Consumer Electronics). Some sources in Taiwan implied that such a restructuring may ultimately mean spin-off the microprocessor and/or chipset groups into standalone companies, enlisting new investors from mainboard makers and semiconductor foundries, so to ease negotiations with Intel Corp. about chipset bus license, as the latter company reportedly has negative attitude to Via’s CPU business.

According to a report of referenced to Economic Daily News (EDN) by DigiTimes web-site, Via has dismissed speculations that it may spin off its CPU and chipset businesses in order to receive license on development and selling chipsets compatible with microprocessors by Intel Corp.

Under the terms of the agreement signed in early April, 2003, Via Technologies received a four year license to design and sell chipsets that are compatible with the Intel microprocessor bus and sell those chipsets for a fifth year without infringing Intel’s patents. However, starting from April, 2007, Via has no rights to roll-out new chipsets supporting processors by Intel, unless a new licensing deal is inked.

Via’s competitor in Taiwan, Silicon Integrated Systems Corp., has recently signed an agreement with Intel, under which it can develop, manufacture and sell core-logic sets for Intel processors supporting 1333MHz processor system bus as well as quad-core central processing units (CPUs). But SiS has different licensing strategy than Nvidia Corp. and Via: SiS makes agreements concerning every new processor system bus (PSB) speed-bin, whereas Nvidia and Via prefer broad, multi-year patent cross-license agreements across multiple product lines and product generations along with the PSB license.

For Via, whose sales dropped from a little lower than one billion of dollars back in 2001 to about $650 million in 2006, it is important to obtain the license to make chipsets for Intel’s microprocessors. But it might not be really crucial for the company’s revenue though. Via’s overall chipset market share has been decreasing for years now, but the company’s sales remained in the range of $600 million (partially because of gradual drop of U.S. currency on the international markets) and even increased a bit in 2006 due to success of Via’s processor and application-specific chip business. Nevertheless, chipset business remains attractive for the company for several reasons.

<%BANNER[banner_468x60_f]%>

Discussion

Comments currently: 0

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Thursday, January 8, 2009

10:12 pm | AMD Cuts Price of ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 Graphics Card. ATI Reduces Pricing of Flagship Graphics Card to $449

3:04 pm | Sony Releases Its First Netbook Computer – Vaio P-Series. Sony Launches World’s Slimmest Notebook

11:44 am | Skype Enables VoIP Service on Hundreds of Mobile Phones. Skype Now Available for Java, Android Handset Platforms

9:27 am | AMD Lets the Dragon Out, Releases Phenom II Processors . AMD Intros Its Fastest Desktop Microprocessor Ever with the Phenom II Launch

Wednesday, January 7, 2009

11:24 pm | Intel Reconsiders Financial Results for Q4 for the Second Time. Intel Further Lowers Q4 Expectations

11:08 pm | One Laptop per Child Foundation Cuts Staff, Refocuses Mission. OLPC Faces Tough Economic Times

3:42 pm | Lenovo Reportedly Prepares for Restructuring. Lenovo Blames Reliance on Corporate Customers for Low Market Share

12:47 pm | U.S. Authorities Okay Creation of The Foundry Company. Committee on Foreign Investment Clears Path for Creation of “The Foundry Company”