In an attempt to offer the best platforms for new processors from Advanced Micro Devices, its long-term partner Nvidia Corp. plans to release a series of PCI Express 2.0 supporting chipsets this fall. It is highly likely that by fall the world’s No. 1 supplier of discrete graphics processors unveils its graphics chips compatible with PCIe 2.0.
The new code-named MCP72 core-logic series will fully support new AMD Phenom processors based on AMD’s new micro-architecture that belong to the “Stars” family of chips. All versions of the MCP72 will support HyperTransport 3.0 processor bus as well as PCI Express 2.0 interconnection, which will be the key-features of the new array of chipsets.
Initially three versions of the new Nvidia nForce 7-series chipsets will be available: MCP72XE, MCP72P, MCP72 Ultra and MCP72V. Mass production of the first two will start in October, according to sources familiar with Nvidia’s plans, the schedule for MCP72 Ultra is undecided, whereas MCP72V will be produced only in 2008, in time for mass production of AMD’s new processors for mainstream and entry-level systems.
The most powerful flavour of the new core-logic series – MCP72XE – is projected to consist of two chips so that to support two PCI Express 2.0 x16 lanes for two (or more) add-on graphics cards and three PCIe 2.0 x1 lanes for other expansions. The enthusiast-oriented MCP72XE will also support memory modules with enhanced performance profiles (EPP), 1GbE network controller, six Serial ATA ports with RAID capabilities, two Parallel ATA drives, twelve USB 2.0 and other capabilities.
The less advanced version of Nvidia nForce 700a-series – MCP72P – will consist of one chips and will feature similar I/O capabilities compared to the higher-performance version, but will not support EPP memory modules, will only have two PCI Express 2.0 x8 lanes for multi-GPU capability and two PCI Express 2.0 x1 lanes for other add-in cards.
Nvidia’s code-named MCP72 Ultra core-logic will also consist of one chip and will have similar feature-set compared to the MCP72P with the only exception being the lack of multi-GPU support and presence of one PCIe 2.0 x16 lane. MCP72V version will also not support multi-GPU and will come with lower amount of expansion capabilities.
Nvidia traditionally does not comment on unreleased products.
Comments currently: 184
Discussion started: 06/03/07 01:50:23 AM
Latest comment: 03/19/08 05:24:05 AM
Expand all threads |
Collapse all threads
1.
By Q4 2007 (Xmas) NVIDIA will be releasing their GeForce 9800 series GPUs.
Unlike previously expected the codename for nVidia's next generation GPU will NOT be "G90" but instead be "G92".
I have some info form NVIDIA insider about the upcoming G92 graphics processors.
G92 will be released in November 2007 timeframe in the form of "GeForce 9800" series.
"G92" GeForce 9800 GTX specs.
- 65nm process technology at TSMC.
- Over one billion transistors.
- Second Generation Unified Shader Architecture.
- Double precsion support (FP64).
- GPGPU native.
- Over one TeraFLOPS of shader processing power.
- MADD+ADD configuration for the shader untis (2+1 FLOPS=3 FLOPS per ALU)
- Fully Scalar design.
- 512-bit memory interface.
- 1024MB GDDR4 graphics memory.
- DirectX 10.1 support.
- OpenGL 3.0 Support.
- eDRAM die for "FREE 4xAA".
- built in Audio Chip.
- built in tesselation unit (in the graphics core"
- Improved AA and AF quality levels
Pros.
65nm process will allow for better yields and better power consumption. power consumption will be lower than that of a GeForce 8800 GTX.
GeForce 9800 GTX will be over two times faster than a GeForce 8800 Ultra in real world games and applcations.
Release date : November 2007. There will be TWO products at launch: The flagship GeForce 9800 GTX and the second fastest GeForce 9800 GTS.
price for the GeForce 9800 GTX will be 549-649 USD.
price for the GeForce 9800 GTS will be 399-449 USD.
[Posted by: Erik Larsson | Date: 06/03/07 01:50:23 AM]
+ expand thread (19 answers)
- collapse thread
Erik is that really true? can we be sure about the release date?
thats a powerfull gfx....
[Posted by: OblivioN_ | Date: 06/10/07 09:36:28 AM]
Erik, you are full of shit.
You're going to need some insane sources to back up those unbeliavble claims.
[Posted by: Track | Date: 07/25/07 01:35:25 PM]
It'd be nice if you would learn how to spell!
[Posted by: bungle | Date: 08/03/07 11:32:19 PM]
Actually if you will take a look at the inquirer website now the 9800 is confirmed. Due to come out in Fall in America
[Posted by: Raza | Date: 08/15/07 09:25:02 PM]
don't know the relese date , but 99 % wil be in November
[Posted by: eddy | Date: 07/27/07 12:55:16 AM]
HEY GUYS I JUST FOUND THIS, ITS EVEN NEWER INFORMATION ON THE 9800 SERIES!
Ive just received word from the most reliable source in the world.....JESUS. He has told me the following about the 9800 JTX (Jesus X-Treme) !
-6500MM (mega metre) process technology, at MSMMMCFPPC
-Over 700 thousand transvestites
-Second Generation Unified Vader Architecture
-Triple precision magnitude flux capacitors
-GPGPUPGPU-PEE-YEW! native
-Over one TeraFARTS of shader processing ability like jedi's
-MAD+AD homosexual party
-Fully secular priesthood design (touch those kiddies with extra fps!)
-1280-bit memory interface (cos god doesn't hold back)
-4TB GDDR7 graphics memory
-DirectX 42.12c support
-OpenJL 500.326.8 compliant shader support
-eDRAM die for "FREE BJ from a priest"
-built in Cunt (for real men)
-built in boobs
-Improved AA and Ahh fuck off quality levels
"Produced by god, patented by jesus"
You made so many spelling mistakes in your version Erik. Im thinking a real Nvidia source would be less sloppy.
[Posted by: IAgreeWithHim | Date: 07/29/07 05:41:31 AM]
LMAO!!!!!! JESUS X-TREME HAHAHAHAHA!
[Posted by: 16 Alpha | Date: 07/29/07 12:29:37 PM]
Thank you for making me laugh harder than I have ever laughed in about 2 years. JESUS X-TREME HAHAHAHAHA
[Posted by: Rosco | Date: 07/30/07 02:29:40 PM]
If this card realy is 2times faster then most the geforce 8800 ultra you bet im going to buy it!
that must be awsome when your playing games with full AA and AF on.
then i havn't wait all this time for nothing. i hope there will be new CPU lines out as well around the first quarter of 2008 then i might buy an uber computer hehe! :)
[Posted by: DR. Satan | Date: 08/20/07 01:17:58 AM]
sigh... this reminds me of how stupid anime characters are. I never though humans could be this guliblle. Congrats kid your now in the running for the most gullible people's choice award!!!
[Posted by: gullible.com admin | Date: 10/30/07 02:24:46 AM]
Wait what 4tb graphics memory??? is that even possible right now for 600 bucks?
[Posted by: Consumer | Date: 11/01/07 04:47:04 PM]
XD !!! I laughed so hard it made me cry, fall of my chair and almost shit myself!
[Posted by: punani | Date: 11/02/07 02:31:54 PM]
That is a whole lot of shit
[Posted by: Info Tech Guy | Date: 11/05/07 04:51:12 PM]
yeah Erik posted the OP and then asked about his own OP, real genius there lol
[Posted by: largebigamazingwhale | Date: 12/08/07 10:35:46 AM]
i like the sound of the jesus card
where can i buy one from
i can then stuff of the wife and just use the built in cunt
hang on i think i will wait for the GT version or maybe i month later get the
god gts xxxxxxx ultra version with a strap on cock as well so my video card can shag itself
[Posted by: bob | Date: 01/27/08 05:31:38 PM]
I wish this were true, but...
I wish this were true, but...
I wish this were true, but...
I wish this were true, but...
I wish this were true, but...
I wish this were true, but...
I wish this were true, but...
I wish this were true, but...
[Posted by: Everyone else | Date: 08/03/07 07:38:39 PM]
Nice , you can copy/paste things off of wikipedia .
[Posted by: Radiator | Date: 08/10/07 01:00:16 AM]
9800XT : why-oh -why use an old ATI number? (Aaaah the good old SimFUSION 6500Q with 4x9800XT...)
[Posted by: 3DFlightSim | Date: 10/08/07 05:23:38 AM]
I Love Jesus
[Posted by: Ody | Date: 03/09/08 11:05:02 AM]
2.
Sounds pretty weak compared to the X38 IMO
[Posted by: 457R4L | Date: 06/10/07 02:47:28 AM]
+ expand thread (4 answers)
- collapse thread
X38 is a northbridge chipset on motherboards, G92 is supposed to be the new GPU for Nvidia Geforce 9 series cards; you can't compare them.
[Posted by: MattH | Date: 08/02/07 12:53:59 PM]
You can, really
[Posted by: IAgreeWithHim | Date: 08/26/07 06:06:48 AM]
No you can't jackass, thats like comparing apples and oranges.
[Posted by: dabz | Date: 09/03/07 08:43:56 PM]
Ones crunchy n green the others juicy n orange.
There u go compared
[Posted by: Mr.Monkey.Fish | Date: 09/27/07 09:40:31 AM]
3.
what we really want to know is will it work with the older 965p, 680i, 975x chipsets, on a pci-e 1 slot.
[Posted by: Sinny | Date: 07/15/07 10:22:36 AM]
+ expand thread (8 answers)
- collapse thread
Yes.
I'll be waiting for the R700 I think ;)
[Posted by: Willef | Date: 07/16/07 03:26:57 AM]
yeah, wait for ATI's next shit card you moron
[Posted by: Duffman | Date: 07/25/07 01:59:56 PM]
Yea a fucking will be, got a problem?
I never said its the R700 I'll buy though.
[Posted by: willef | Date: 07/25/07 02:07:26 PM]
You're a moron, you know. And yeah I have a fucking problem with that.
[Posted by: huhhuhuhuhu | Date: 07/27/07 09:53:39 PM]
Leave him alone just because hes not like "OMG SPECS THAT COULD BE POSTED BY ANYONE ARE 100% TRUE" I dont believe this anymore than I believed Ageia would actually become a dominant force in technology
[Posted by: IAgreeWithHim | Date: 07/29/07 05:18:43 AM]
shutup
[Posted by: shutup | Date: 09/28/07 06:49:23 PM]
STFU n00bs
[Posted by: yo momma | Date: 10/10/07 06:50:03 AM]
Fail
[Posted by: pOOPTYpUTYpANTYS | Date: 10/24/07 11:42:56 AM]
4.
That looks like one serous card.
[Posted by: niggerpuppet | Date: 07/16/07 08:22:53 AM]
5.
Wow, that is one hell of a card..... I'm barely surviving with my gpu right now and i'm thinking of upgrading to one of these. I'm just not sure if I can hold on this long... Are you sure the release is on November? And will the power consimption be more like the 8800 gts?
[Posted by: needabettergpu | Date: 07/16/07 12:17:19 PM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)
- collapse thread
I'm allmost sure that the releasedate in November is a guess from nVidia..
If so, well, then you should expect a little delay - about 2 months..
Around January you should be able to buy it (:
[Posted by: Han$en | Date: 07/20/07 05:54:14 AM]
6.
why arnt they using hdmi yet? id like to plug it straight into my hd lcd/tv. i bet as soon as i buy it the next cards out will have hdmi.
[Posted by: avatara | Date: 07/21/07 08:44:47 PM]
+ expand thread (2 answers)
- collapse thread
you acn always buy a DVi to HDMI cable... that is what i do..
[Posted by: DyTTo | Date: 08/09/07 06:04:33 PM]
There is support for HDMI
[Posted by: Mr.Monkey.Fish | Date: 09/27/07 09:42:05 AM]
7.
Your kidding me. Who needs something THIS good?
[Posted by: AussieT | Date: 07/24/07 11:59:03 PM]
+ expand thread (12 answers)
- collapse thread
who doesn't need something this good... a fair amount of dx10 games will be out by xmas and for running em maxed out on a 30" monitor (2560x1600)¿ an 8800gtx sli simply wont do. and if it does it'll cost more than this 1 card so personally i'd rather take 1 good card for less than 2 cards. also current 8 series cards are fairly suck as they are very inefficient, poorly optimized, and performance is limited with current design. for ex: in NVIDIA's current architectures, the interpolation units are a major bottleneck where more attributes can require interpolating for vertices than the interpolation unit can handle. this is only 1 of a few other simple easy to fix design flaws that shoudl be ironed out with the g92 series cards. which is one reason nVidia has manages to make a card 2-3x more powerful in only 1 year.
example of 8800gtx sucking is the best gtx can only manage a minimum of 16fps in lost planet stress test. noted lost planet isnt optimized for pc and current drivers suck.
[Posted by: mxpenguin | Date: 07/25/07 01:06:23 AM]
Yeah, I was about to sya that Lost Planet is a pretty bad example for showing how bad the 8800GTX sucks (which it doesn't), b/c that game's a shitty console port.
[Posted by: Gary | Date: 07/25/07 09:55:21 AM]
Basically, no. Current GTX and GTS cards are amazing. Thats not to say anything to come out later wont be better, of course it will. But buying an 8800 card now and getting amazing performance on DX9 AND DX10 games is probably not such a bad idea. I mean, theres such a thing as waiting forever and just thinking "The next one, ill get the next one!"
[Posted by: IAgreeWithHim | Date: 07/29/07 05:22:47 AM]
Crysis's min req is 6800GTX and recommended is a 7800GTX, it will work very well on a 8800GTX, so that doesnt really answer the question of why it needs to be so good...
[Posted by: MattH | Date: 08/02/07 12:57:53 PM]
a lot of cards only got 22fps on lost planet it wasnt specificly the gtx it was most cards mid to high range,,, as u say shitty console port
[Posted by: jamieson | Date: 11/11/07 12:28:55 PM]
umm... Crysis
[Posted by: Juman | Date: 07/27/07 09:41:57 PM]
Crysis's min req is 6800GTX and recommended is a 7800GTX, it will work very well on a 8800GTX, so that doesnt really answer the question of why it needs to be so good...
[Posted by: MattH | Date: 08/02/07 12:58:34 PM]
Gosh. Those who play Solitaire shouldn't post.
[Posted by: huhhuhuhuhu | Date: 07/27/07 09:55:45 PM]
Because even with two 8800 Ultra cards in SLi, games like Flight Simulator X will give you shit frame rates if you try to run it on ultra high settings. Dont expect Crysis to be any better.
[Posted by: FRAGM4STER | Date: 08/10/07 05:09:04 AM]
When Nvidia unveiled the 8800gtx they ran Crysis on one 8800gtx in full graphics with dx10 with a 50+fps im pretty sure it'll run okay.
[Posted by: Major][Woody | Date: 10/04/07 07:29:24 AM]
haha yeh what a load of shit
[Posted by: shit | Date: 02/26/08 10:22:20 AM]
sorry m8 just wanted to add comment to your flight sim x and 88gtx did you even try it on one card ? well i think that you will find that it works better on 1 card than on two i get 45 fps @1920x1200 on a single 88 i have 2 in sli but just for pities sake i took one out and ran the game........ geez another baddly optimized game yet again crysis on the other hand well it uses sli but you only gane 10 fps more for having 2 fat cards in there what a waste i hope that nvidia have it sorted out in these new g92 s bets regards BB
[Posted by: brixton basher | Date: 11/19/07 03:40:39 AM]
8.
2 times faster? no fucking way, it'd be awesome, but i don't believe it.
i get awful fps in the lost planet stress test...
but if you disable high shadows and set them to medium, i think it's 2 options you have to switch, the fps triples =)
visually, i can't see the diff either, both look just as good.
wow... i'd love all this to be true... time to sell my gtx8800 =)
[Posted by: true about the lost planet... | Date: 07/25/07 02:09:54 AM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)
- collapse thread
Come on dude It is possible the 8800 GTX is right the most powerfull card at the moment but it was rushed badly thus very unefficient when released.Graphics do have capped "Limit" because soon you'll have graphics card that will be sooo fucking hot you'd need dryice to keep it cool enough to play.
[Posted by: =MX=Neo | Date: 09/26/07 08:39:23 AM]
9.
Time to sell ur 8800GTX for 200 bucks to me :D
[Posted by: Skymaster | Date: 07/25/07 09:15:20 AM]
10.
thx for the update Erik, any idea whether this new G92 based cards will work on older pci-e 1.0 slot?
i'm using a 680i and i certainly hope i dun have to change my mb jus for this card
[Posted by: penguin1 | Date: 07/25/07 09:40:41 AM]
11.
PCIe 2 right?
[Posted by: BrightMoon | Date: 07/25/07 09:53:18 AM]
12.
As long as they don't reuse 6600GT PCBs AGAIN for the 9600 series...
I don't even know why they reuse the PCBs and the 128bit bus that comes with it for the 7600 or 8600 series, if I see a 6600GT PCB/128bit bus for the 9600 series I think my head would explode.
[Posted by: Raptor22 | Date: 07/25/07 11:00:09 AM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)
- collapse thread
That would be simply stupid .
[Posted by: Radiator | Date: 08/10/07 12:55:23 AM]
13.
"I have some info form NVIDIA insider"
Yeh, sureeee you do..
This seems 100% bullshit to me.
[Posted by: Track | Date: 07/25/07 01:34:06 PM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)
- collapse thread
Is this the first time you've read a fucking article with spelling or grammar mistakes.
[Posted by: huhhuhuhuhu | Date: 07/27/07 09:58:14 PM]
14.
No they'll use 64-bit bus!
[Posted by: N64 | Date: 07/25/07 01:43:57 PM]
15.
Probaly not even ,theyre gona do 2500mhz memory on a 32 bit bus and a whole wopping 132 shaders.
woopdeedoo, this is fake.
1 BILLION transistors??? HELLO, how much heat/power is this thing gona do?
[Posted by: Joz | Date: 07/25/07 02:36:09 PM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)
- collapse thread
Maybe if you knew anything about electronics you wouldn’t have posted that comment.
[Posted by: Grey | Date: 10/07/07 04:03:13 PM]
16.
@Erik,
You know people aren't going to believe you without more proof.
I caught the same kind of flack (people saying it was bull) on another forum last year when I posted a link I found on VR-Zone about the pending release of 680i mobos.
Anyway, if this is true, I think I'll forego buying a new GPU until November, as I was planning on getting an X38 board around then anyway.
[Posted by: Al K. Hall | Date: 07/25/07 02:53:02 PM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)
- collapse thread
You should get the X48 instead.
[Posted by: Steve | Date: 09/27/07 02:01:25 PM]
17.
nobody will ever need more that 512k of system memory
[Posted by: Buford | Date: 07/25/07 03:33:15 PM]
+ expand thread (8 answers)
- collapse thread
WHATTTT U forreal????
i hope this is true.
and to the guy about the 6600gt resused PBC's
MANNNN i hope they dont reuse them YET AGAIN, (i have two 8600gts) but i didnt pay over 200 :P haha
[Posted by: tyler | Date: 07/25/07 05:27:28 PM]
I said 640KB YOU N00B
[Posted by: Bill Gates | Date: 08/01/07 03:49:30 PM]
i love that quote.. i haven't laughed this hard since that last noob i popped
[Posted by: fehz | Date: 08/27/07 07:56:26 PM]
ROFLMFAO no more than 512MB eh? Are you aware what RAM does?
[Posted by: Canto-X | Date: 10/29/07 12:08:30 PM]
whoops typo on previous comment. 512K OMFG That wont even run frikken DOS man
[Posted by: Canto-X | Date: 10/29/07 12:09:44 PM]
You are the weakest link. Good bye
[Posted by: Vito | Date: 11/08/07 09:46:15 AM]
DOS only needed 384kb to run....damn 13 year old wannabe techs....it just goes to show that anyone who knows what they're talking about isn't taking this seriously. also he's referring to the IBM XT's original limit of 512kb
[Posted by: RandomHero | Date: 11/15/07 08:28:52 AM]
hmmm not that it maters this is dead as ass.. don't know why i'm bringing it up or if it was already stated but this was a quite from Bill Gates from way back in the day.
[Posted by: CracR | Date: 11/28/07 11:17:28 PM]
18.
Dude, there's no way that's real. You're fulla crap.
[Posted by: Dantis | Date: 07/25/07 03:52:25 PM]
19.
BS
[Posted by: JaakZ | Date: 07/25/07 04:01:56 PM]
20.
1 BILLION?
Lets see im sure 1 billion = 1'000'000'000
Don't CPUs have something around the 200-600 Million transistors?
Thats 500'000'000 so this 1 card which doesn't do nearly as much as a CPU yet has twice the amount of transistors?
[Posted by: Scott | Date: 07/25/07 06:28:45 PM]
+ expand thread (6 answers)
- collapse thread
GPUs have been exceeding the number of transistors that cpus have for a while now....What rock have you been hiding under?
Why do you think Nvidia came up with the Tesla GPU based processors for computations that normal cpus can't even touch? Look it up, man! Seriously!!
[Posted by: BobT | Date: 07/25/07 06:58:59 PM]
R600 alone had around 700 million transistors and the 8800 series around 690 million.
[Posted by: N64 | Date: 07/26/07 06:30:49 AM]
the reason tesla performs so well is that it uses parralel computing. it utilizes the 128 stream processors in the g80 core to do the processing work. it is not simply a matter of raw processing power, its putting a bunch of weaker processors into a smaller package. even so tesla is a beast
[Posted by: junkie | Date: 08/01/07 02:44:18 AM]
Gosh. You need to get up to date with GPU transistors count.
[Posted by: huhhuhuhuhu | Date: 07/27/07 10:01:11 PM]
Dude, face it, you might be right and these specs might be true, but chances are they are not....this happens all the time, ALL the time in the PC camp, and pretty much all the time on the internet in general, there are probably people sitting around laughing their asses off at how seriously you are taking this, either that or you are pretending to be serious and laughing at us for trying to convince you its a load of crap.
[Posted by: IAgreeWithHim | Date: 07/29/07 05:28:10 AM]
Totally irrelevant but sounds like Dragon Ball Z.
D8E/D9E (9800GTX or whatever)'s power level is @ 1,000,000,000
Man this card is as powerful as SSJ3 Goku (supercharged)!
Just awesome!
[Posted by: MazingerZ9 | Date: 10/26/07 08:28:36 AM]