<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
<%BANNER[banner_468x60_h]%>
<%BANNER[news_300]%>

News

<%BANNER[fp_160x600_r_1]%>

While a lot of memory module manufacturers have been talking about DDR3 clock-speeds of about 2.0GHz and beyond, not many have so far managed to introduce such blazingly fast memory. However, A-Data, a large maker of memory modules, as well as Walton Chaintech, recently unveiled their PC3-16000 products.

A-Data Vitesta DDR3-2000X memory modules can operate at 2.0GHz with CL9 9-9-24 latency settings and 2.05V – 2.15V voltage settings. A-Data sells its Vitesta DDR3-2000X as 2GB dual-channel kit (two modules per 1GB), though, pricing of such memory modules is unknown.

Walton Chaintech, the company that used to be known primarily for its graphics cards and mainboards several years ago, also plans to introduce its Apogee GT Blazer-series memory modules, which will feature 2.0GHz clock-speed and CL9 8-8-24 timings, reports VR-Zone web-site. Pricing of such memory modules is also unclear.

The highest speed memory modules presently available from well-known memory module brands, such as Corsair Memory or OCZ Technology, can work at about 1.8 – 1.86GHz.

While 2.0GHz clock-speed may be considered as a milestone for memory modules, this milestone may be too high for the vast majority of chipsets and mainboards available. Theoretically, memory controller of the latest Intel X38 can handle 2.0GHz memory; however, according to people with knowledge of the matter, in reality it depends on the actual ASIC. Therefore, not many enthusiasts will be able to take advantage of 2000MHz memory modules at present.

<%BANNER[banner_468x60_f]%>

Related news

Discussion

<%BANNER[fp_160x600_r_2]%>
Comments currently: 2
Discussion started: 12/26/07 12:32:21 AM
Latest comment: 12/26/07 06:29:55 PM

[1-2]

1. 
but at that latency?
[Posted by: 31415 | Date: 12/26/07 12:32:21 AM]

2. 
And with the ridiculous prices they are charging for DDR$ err I mean DDR3 its no wonder ppl are sticking to DDR2 for as long as possible

Luckily AMD wont be using DDR3 for a little while yet, just imagine what those latencies would do to CPU performance which is not so critical when using Intel cores
[Posted by: alpha0ne | Date: 12/26/07 06:29:55 PM]

[1-2]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Latest News

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

3:51 pm | ATI Demonstrates Mobility Radeon HD 4000 Graphics Processor, Readies Dual-Chip Mobile Graphics Solution. ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4000-Series Graphics Chip Shows Up

2:08 pm | Super Talent Dramatically Slashes Prices of Entry-Level Solid-State Drives. Super Talent's 64GB SSD Now Available for $179

8:39 am | ATI Intros New Entry-Level Graphics Cards. AMD Launches New ATI Radeon HD 4350, 4550 Products

Monday, September 29, 2008

11:39 pm | ARM Teams Up with IBM, Chartered, Samsung to Create System-on-Chip Designs for Next-Gen Mobile Electronics. Industry Alliance to Enable Energy-Efficient 32nm and 28nm Systems-on-Chip

11:26 pm | AMD: Shanghai Processors Are In Full Production. AMD Says It Is On-Track with New Server Chip

9:46 pm | Lenovo Is Ready for Another Take Over on Personal Computer Market. Lenovo May Acquire Part of Fujitsu Siemens Computers

1:21 pm | ATI Readies New Mainstream Graphics Card. AMD Preps ATI Radeon HD 4830

1:20 pm | Diamond Multimedia Accuses Ex-Employee of Spreading Misinformation. Diamond Multimedia Denies Existence of Defective Graphics Cards

10:03 am | Sony PlayStation 4 Likely to Feature Improved Version of Cell Processor. Sony Expected to Look at Lower Cost Hardware for PlayStation 4