Even though Intel is quite serious about its Intel Atom processors aimed at low-power consumer electronics and mobile devices, ARM, which develops processors that power the vast majority of mobile phones sold worldwide believes that Intel Atom is not a serious competitor for its chips and that market positions of ARM will not be affected with the roll out of Atom.
“Who is to say it will be Intel taking market share from ARM and not the other way? Intel will probably always be able to make a microprocessor that runs faster, but ARM can do one that uses less power. We are still a long way ahead in that,” said Warren East, chief executive officer of ARM Holdings, in an interview with Financial Times.
Currently ARM powers about 98% of mobile phones sold worldwide, however, with the trend towards low-power computers and consumer electronics, ARM microprocessors can compete against Intel’s x86 chips on their territory, said chief exec of ARM Holdings, an IP company.
“It is still very early days, and its not a sector we are proactively pursuing, but some companies are looking at servers based on ARM,” said Mr. East.
Still, it does not mean that Intel, which is already the world’s largest maker of chips for personal computers, cannot steal ARM’s market with its high-performance offerings over time. For example, Intel Atom Z500 processor that costs $45 in business quantities has thermal design power of 0.65W can truly power advanced handhelds like Apple iPhone or RIM Blackberry.
Comments currently:
9
Discussion started: 05/26/08 05:38:54 PM
Latest comment: 05/28/08 06:18:42 AM
Expand all threads |
Collapse all threads
[1-7]
1.
Yeeaah i think i'd be pretty worried if I was ARM
[
Posted by: mejobloggs

|
Date: 05/26/08 05:38:54 PM]
2.
Man.....Given ur lithium battery has 1000mAh @ 3W, a mobile phone powered by Atom can't last over a bit more than 4 hrs stand-by time.
[
Posted by: 0.65W is still too much for mobile phone

|
Date: 05/26/08 07:37:28 PM]
3.
If u have programmed ARM for embedded systems b4, u'll know that she have many power saving features that Intel x86 can never do!
[
Posted by: ARM is better for portables

|
Date: 05/26/08 07:38:58 PM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)
- collapse thread
Bingo. Atom as a platform lags by about a factor of two in performance/watt under load compared to current-gen ARM chips. Under idle conditions, it's an order of magnitude or two. And that's using Intel-spun numbers. Reality is likely to be worse for Atom.
The only thing that Atom has going for it is that it goes up higher in pure performance. Of course, the power consumption of these high end parts puts them more into the territory of Via, who is the real target IMO.
[
Posted by: Cynic

|
Date: 05/26/08 11:58:45 PM]
4.
I'd give a leg for an arm..
[
Posted by: CoffeDK

|
Date: 05/26/08 11:03:06 PM]
5.
The x86 ISA of Atom is it's advantage and disadvantage.
Disadvantage: it needs lots of transistors which ARM does not need.
Advantage: it has many refined developer tools and support.
It's advantage is also a small problem, as many developers are not used to optimizing their code, which any low-power system will need.
[
Posted by: mathew7

|
Date: 05/26/08 11:23:38 PM]
6.
ARM's code and instructions were designed from the ground up as power efficient.
For example with the ARM architecture you need less instructions to get a job done.
If Intell wants to takle ARM at this turf it needs a more effecient code than the X86. Intell needs to find a way to cram code so it can use less memory like ARM's Thumb.
From what I heard the Atom is still a Gass Guzzler compared to ARM.
And that has mostly to do with the 86X archtecture not being as efficient.
At first glance it seems Intel despite it's capital is still hadicap in this market with the X86 code. It needs to come with something different to fight ARM with.
Not that I mind. Arm needs to be kept on it's toes too.
Their cores are one of the most expensive for the die surface.
Who knows.. In the 90s everybody knew that RISC would replace CISC until Intel proved everybody wrong.
[
Posted by: huh

|
Date: 05/27/08 04:23:10 AM]
7.
i think one perspective not offered looks past the energy issue. It may be that emerging battery technologies make energy consumption less important.
the infrastructer of atom now, further application as new battery technology comes to the market.
[
Posted by: mope

|
Date: 05/27/08 06:33:29 AM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)
- collapse thread
more advanced battery means good news for Atom but better news for ARM
[
Posted by: hmm

|
Date: 05/28/08 06:18:42 AM]
[1-7]