Both Blu-ray disc (BD) and HD DVD camps are currently offering rather alluring deals to get players at decent prices along with free high-definition movies. But while Sony and Toshiba are fighting to make their backed formats dominant, they also have to popularize high-definition content overall, as apparently only half of those who may be interested in high-definition players know about them.
HDTV Owners Not Aware about High-Definition Video Formats
“As HDTV penetration continues to grow, manufacturers and studios will need to do a better job imparting the benefits of these formats to a consumer base that still reports a high satisfaction with the current DVD standard,” said Ross Rubin, director, industry analysis, consumer electronics.
According to a report by NPD Group released on Monday, among those who currently own HDTVs, only 52% are familiar with the availability of high-definition DVD players, but only 11% expressed strong intentions to buy one in the next six months. Around 73% of HDTV owners reported that their current traditional-format DVD player still works well for them, so they do not need to replace it; while 62% said they are waiting for the prices of high-definition players to fall.
NPD survey revealed that consumers’ knowledge of the HD DVD format is more prevalent than for the Blu-ray disc format: 29% of respondents were aware of HD DVD, whereas just 20% had heard of Blu-ray disc. Consumers who purchased a Blu-ray disc player reported that they did so because they believed it was superior to HD DVD; while those who purchased an HD DVD player did so because the price was lower than a BD player.
Familiarity with the latest formats is primarily coming from exposure to marketing – especially television commercials. 41% of consumers who say they are familiar with Blu-ray disc players and content gained awareness through ads and commercials. The same – 20% – is true for HD DVD. Nearly 20% consumers reported learning about the devices from friends and family.
More High-Definition Content Needed on the Market
Difficulty in communicating the high-definition message is compounded by the relatively small amount of available content in either of the two formats. NPD’s research shows that 64% of DVDs purchased by high-definition owners are standard definition; however, the primary reason consumers reported buying a traditional DVD was that the high-definition disc was not available.
“Early adopters aren’t choosing to evangelize high-definition players to others, in large part because they are unhappy with the available selection,” said Russ Crupnick, vice president and senior entertainment industry analyst. “The good news is that the industry can address this concern by releasing HD DVD and Blu-ray disc titles more aggressively.”
One encouraging signal for the industry is that existing HD DVD and BD consumers are trading up from standard definition. According to NPD, early adopters plan to replace nearly a quarter (23%) of their current collections with high-definition format DVDs (either HD DVD or Blu-ray Disc), and there is an appetite for more.
For NPD’s High Definition Video Player Report Series, more than 5,500 adults were surveyed between June 18 and June 28, 2007. Among the sample were 542 pre-identified owners of high-definition players and high-definition capable video game consoles. NPD’s new High Definition Video Report Series examines consumer awareness, ownership, usage patterns, and intent to purchase high-definition players and content, since these new technologies were introduced last year.
Comments currently:
10
Discussion started: 09/25/07 05:50:41 AM
Latest comment: 09/27/07 05:35:06 AM
Expand all threads |
Collapse all threads
[1-6]
1.
* Consumers Need More Motives to Migrate to High-Definition Video *
like adult entertainment... else this technology gonna die....
[
Posted by: Alien

|
Date: 09/25/07 05:50:41 AM]
2.
Here's how to motivate people: Don't have a format war! At this rate, this will turn into "SACD vs. DVD-Audio Part 2: We Didn't Learn the Last Time"
[
Posted by: lonechicken

|
Date: 09/25/07 07:35:24 AM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)
- collapse thread
Customer stupidity also played a large part in that particular format war. Although YES, there never should have been a format war, it was a mark of idiocy that the two formats were named after another technology. Because I can just about guarantee that the average customer went something like this:
"Hm. DVD-Audio... how is this different from a music DVD that is over in the DVD section? This is too confusing. I'm not buying it."
or
"SACD. How is this different from a regular CD? And you need a special player for it? This is too confusing. I'm not buying it."
They REALLY should have gone with something like HR-AD (for High Resolution Audio Disc) or something like that. It should have had ABSOLUTELY no connection with previous formats.
As far as HDTV though, the battle to get people to upgrade will NOT be fought in media format wars. Nearly every person I know says that 480p DVDs look good enough on their TV's for them and that they don't feel a huge desire to upgrade, even if playing them side-by-side.
Where you see the STRONG desire to upgrade into higher resolution formats is in broadcast TV. Regular cable and regular OTA TV just simply looks like ASS on a HD screen. If you want people to upgrade to a better setup, simply show them how much better that HD cable (or OTA) looks than the regular stuff and you'll have to fight them off with a stick.
And yes, DRM is going to be a huge hurdle for the consumer to get over. I know that's why I won't upgrade.
[
Posted by: Psimitry

|
Date: 09/27/07 05:35:06 AM]
3.
To motivate me to trade up there would need to be a single OPEN format, not 2 diffrent closed formats which assume you're a thief, can be remotly shut down, vendord need to pay a liscence fee to use, will degrade output to my system unless i 'upgrade' all my top-notch kit to heavily encryption encoumbered stuff. I'm not goint to throw away all my home-cinema kit which is very good stuff to comply with their draconen HDCP system...
They will never get me to use it untill its an open format that dosn't force so much crap on the end user and is gaurenteed to be around a long time.
[
Posted by: crisp

|
Date: 09/25/07 10:05:29 AM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)
- collapse thread
Yes. That too.
[
Posted by: lonechicken

|
Date: 09/25/07 01:23:38 PM]
4.
When will they realise that open standards are good for everyone, and closed can only be bad.. also this DRM bullsh*t is getting stupid, they are shooting them selfs in the foot and taking the coustomers down with them
[
Posted by: Sam

|
Date: 09/25/07 10:09:50 AM]
+ expand thread (2 answers)
- collapse thread
This is true, it means that a pirated film actually has MORE VALUE to me than owning a legit disk as I can watch the copy on whatever i want, be that a linux PC, a hand held device, etc. The legit product is crippled to only run how, where and when someone else wants, that's not something that will motivate people to buy the product, especially those who already have the good equipment (potentially the most interested in HD) who now find the output to that equipment will be deliberately downgraded because they are being presumed guilty...
[
Posted by: charlie

|
Date: 09/25/07 01:54:20 PM]
I am totally with you on this. HD-DVD/Blu-ray is worthless to me if I cannot rip the video, compress it, and put it on my home media server. A way of legally doing this would certainly get my attention (and money).
[
Posted by: bigjellysandwich

|
Date: 09/26/07 05:08:58 AM]
5.
I am never going to get any HD movies because of the format war, DRM, and HDCP.
Some motives:
* Provide a movie or video that shows readable object on a HD content, but shows it blurry in the standard DVD. An episode in Futurama has such tactics, but I am not sure if it is true.
* only one HD storage medium that everybody including consumers can agree on
* ease consumer setup instead making it harder such as the HDCP protocol
* no root-kit history in order for the drive to work.
* open format
[
Posted by: linuxnerd

|
Date: 09/26/07 11:07:03 PM]
6.
A Toshiba HD-A2 was on sale recently for the incredible price of $200 so I took the plunge into HD DVD. After a couple of firmware updates the player works great but I can't recommend this technology to anyone.
The first problem is that even after 2 years there is a limited selection of disks and the price point is still too high where I live. I don't mind spending some money but the next problem is that most modern movies in this format have an aspect ratio of 2.35:1 whereas most modern TVs have a 16:9 aspect ratio which is 1.78:1. This results in ugly horizontal black bars on the top and bottom of the screen. I'd rather buy / rent the regular wide screen DVD and use my previous generation Panasonic DVD player. It has an excellent built in scaler so 2.35:1 movies look great when scaled to fully fit my 1.78:1 plasma screen.
The increased clarity and quality of HD DVD isn't worth it if only 75% of my screen is being used. In a couple of months, once the novelty wears off, I think I'll dump my new player on EBay.
If a life long geek like myself isn't blown away by the high def hype, then I know the average consumer isn't going to be impressed either. As more HD programming becomes available on cable TV, I think Blu-ray and HD DVD will both die. The small increase in picture quality isn't worth it for the majority of consumers.
[
Posted by: Kevin G.

|
Date: 09/26/07 11:35:09 PM]
[1-6]