News

Even though copyright protection technologies are meant to exclude possibilities of copying, they do so for a limited time only. Throughout the rest time of their lifespan such technologies usually annoy those customers who acquired their content fairly. Less than a year after finalization the BD+ copyright protection scheme has been completely defeated, claims a software firm.

Slysoft company, which specializes on various disc backup and copy tools, said that its AnyDVD HD software version 6.4.0.0 removes the BD+ protection from Blu-ray discs (BDs). Earlier the company already claimed that AnyDVD HD version 6.2.0.1 removes BD+ from titles available prior to the 20th of November, 2007. Now the software maker claims that the controversial copyright protection scheme, which requires players to have the latest firmware installed to playback a movie, has been cracked completely.

BD+ is one of the copyright protection layers for Blu-ray discs that compliments AACS, HDCP, BD-ROM Mark and so on. BD+ is a small program recorded on a Blu-ray disc that is executed by player and examines whether the players security keys were changed as well as decodes part of the content encrypted with BD+ keys. The BD+ technology was finalized in June, 2007, however, due to nature of the technology, the actual BD+ program may be altered for future BD movie releases, which will require Blu-ray players' firmware to be updated in order to playback those titles.

With BD+ protection removed completely end-users can now watch their BD+ titles using software players that may not support BD+ and even backup or rip their Blu-ray movies.

The reaction of Blu-ray disc association (BDA), movie studios and Macrovision, which sells BD+ licenses, is unclear. Potentially it is possible that a new copyright protection scheme will be introduced for Blu-ray movies in future.

Discussion

Comments currently: 4
Discussion started: 03/21/08 10:37:20 AM
Latest comment: 03/24/08 01:35:09 PM

[1-4]

1. 
Protection made my human, crack made by human.

Nothing else to say.
[Posted by: kensiko  | Date: 03/21/08 10:37:20 AM]

2. 
Ha Ha!
[Posted by: Steve  | Date: 03/22/08 11:55:51 PM]

3. 
The ONLY ppl who are penalized by DRM are those that pay the full dollar for 'ownership'
[Posted by: alpha0ne  | Date: 03/23/08 09:28:25 PM]

4. 
If the players require a firmware upgrade everytime the copy protection is changed ,i can see they wont be selling many players.Consumers that have players will simply protest at the continued firmware upgrades.
[Posted by: Rageykiwi  | Date: 03/24/08 01:35:09 PM]

[1-4]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Saturday, November 7, 2009

3:28 pm | Electronic Book Industry Set to Explode in 2010 – Analysts. E-Book Industry Set to Raise – MIC

1:31 pm | Intel Plans “Fast” Transition to Next-Generation Atom Platform. Intel to Reveal More Details About Pine Trail Platform on December 21

11:27 am | Prices of SSDs Will Get Closer to Hard Drives in Three to Five Years – Chief Executive of OCZ. SSDs Set to Become Much More Affordable in the Future

Friday, November 6, 2009

11:56 am | Microsoft Windows 7 Appears to Be More Popular in Retail than Vista Back in 2007. First Week Windows 7 Sales Surpass Sales of Windows Vista in First Week – Research Firm

9:30 am | Elpida and ProMOS Sign “Technology-for-Capacity” Pact. Elpida to Outsource Production of DRAM to ProMOS