OCZ Technology Group, a leading supplier of dynamic random access memory and flash-based products, has unveiled its family of affordable solid-state drives (SSDs), which price begins at just $169. The new products from OCZ will allow end-users in budget to take advantage of SSD’s energy efficiency.
“SSDs offer higher performance, reliability, and energy efficiency than conventional HDDs but the cost variance has limited adoption of vastly superior SSD technology, until now. It is our mission to deliver the highest performance products to consumers at reasonable prices, and with the release of the Core Series SSDs we have done exactly that,” said Ryan Petersen, chief executive officer of OCZ Technology.
Core-series SSDs are available in capacities of 32GB, 64GB, and 128GB and deliver 120MB/s – 143MB/s read speeds as well as 80MB/s – 93MB/s write speeds as well as 0.35ms seek time, which is inline with OCZ's premium-class SSDs unveiled earlier this year. Still, the main advantage of OCZ Core-series SSDs is their price, which is a result of usage of MLC flash: the company plans to sell its 32GB, 64GB and 128GB flash-based storage products for $169, $259 and $479, respectively, which are very affordable prices.
The drives feature a durable yet lightweight alloy housing and the manufacturer declares 1.5 million hour mean time before failure (MTBF) figures for its SSDs. All Core Series SSD drives come backed a two year warranty and OCZ’s service and support.
Comments currently: 5
Discussion started: 07/01/08 05:24:04 PM
Latest comment: 07/06/08 08:05:46 PM
Expand all threads |
Collapse all threads
[1-4]
1.
According to oene of the latest article in Tomshardware, power saver in using SSD is hoax. See it here --> http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/ssd-hdd-battery,1955 html
[Posted by: Hok | Date: 07/01/08 05:24:04 PM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)
- collapse thread
Be advised that Western Digital is one of their new sponsors. And when they have a sponsor, they brake ALL rules. So that article is probably hoax (for example they do not take into account that CPU, RAM, and other components will take more power with faster HDD, because it "feeds" them faster, etc.). Intel is their sponsor too, and once they had article in which they compared CPU power consumption of intel and amd. In intel box they put 2Gb of RAM and 2 coolers, in AMD box they put 8Gb of RAM and 6 coolers :). People found out this from pictures, and they confirmed, but found "logical explanations" despite known fact that particular intel processor had much higher working temperature.
Reading TomsHardware is really futile except if you want to analyze sponsorship trends in IT industry.
[Posted by: BorgDrone | Date: 07/01/08 11:42:21 PM]
2.
Nice to see SSD starting to become mainstream. Though I wonder how fast and durable this OCZ line actually is.
[Posted by: shae | Date: 07/01/08 06:11:47 PM]
3.
Sign me up i can live with 2x 64gbs ssd's in raid for my primary drive
[Posted by: Sweet | Date: 07/02/08 07:37:38 AM]
4.
Ah.......... Did they find away for SSD to handle more then a million writes/reads? Just thinking about all the patches windows has and other programs. Also anytime the SSD gets fragmented or defrag it, the life of you SSD HD has just dropped alot more then on a HD.
[Posted by: Eric | Date: 07/06/08 08:05:46 PM]
[1-4]