<%BANNER[top_768x90]%>
<%BANNER[banner_468x60_h]%>
<%BANNER[article]%>

News

Apple may stop using chipsets developed by Intel Corp. and start again utilizing proprietary core-logic sets inside its Macintosh computers, according to some market rumours. So far it remains to be seen whether custom-made logic actually improves systems made by Apple, but what is clear is that usage of such devices will eventually not allow anyone to install Apple’s operating system on a non-Apple machine.

At present, Apple Macintosh computers utilize the same central processing units (CPUs), core-logic sets, memory and other components found inside systems from other vendors, such as Dell, Hewlett Packard, Lenovo or Toshiba. As a result, it is theoretically possible to install Apple Mac OS operating system (OS) onto non-Macintosh systems, something, which has been done by Psystar Corp. that sells systems capable of running Mac OS X.

Apple is strongly interested in selling Macintosh computers, even though it does sell its Mac OS X Leopard for $129 separately. Therefore, the company is working to limit possibilities of OS X installation onto non-Apple systems. One of such possibilities is to use proprietary hardware that can be detected by the OS before installation.

According to a news-story by AppleInsider web-site, Apple plans to start using non-Intel chipsets in certain forthcoming Macintosh systems. On the one hand, proprietary core-logic sets will not allow third-parties to use the company’s next-generation operating systems, on the other hand, custom chipsets may bring new capabilities to Apple Macintosh Computers, something that should be appreciated by customers. Even though Apple will continue to use Intel’s microprocessors, to create its own chipsets it will need to receive a license from Intel Corp.

Intel recently confirmed that it had issues with Intel G45 chipset that contains built-in graphics core, therefore, Apple’s intention to create own chipsets (or turn to a third-party core-logic developer like Nvidia Corp., SiS Corp. or Via Technologies) can be understood. However, it should be noted that Apple itself does not have its own graphics core, thus, it would need to acquire standalone graphics chip from a third party, which means larger size of mainboard inside notebooks as well as higher power consumption. Meanwhile, companies like Nvidia and Via have issues with receiving license to make Intel-compatible chipsets.

Apple and Intel did not comment on the news-story.

<%BANNER[banner_468x60_f]%>

Discussion

Comments currently: 4
Discussion started: 07/29/08 07:42:42 AM
Latest comment: 07/30/08 08:39:02 PM

[1-4]

1. 
This sounds pretty dumb. They can stop any commercial cloning in court, and I doubt they care about random hobbyists becoming closet Mac OS X fans. Maybe they'll do something like this for performance reasons, but I can't tell much from this "article."
[Posted by: Krioni | Date: 07/29/08 07:42:42 AM]

2. 
Expensive MACs here they come!!!
[Posted by: clueless | Date: 07/29/08 06:31:37 PM]

3. 
so dis means apple will turn to AMD/ATi for new chipsets??
[Posted by: nick | Date: 07/30/08 06:44:04 AM]

4. 
I have to call BS on this one:
1) Apple doesn't have the expertise to develop chipsets.
2) Apple doesn't have an Intel bus license.
3) It'd take at least two years to develop a new chipset.

Hence, Apple isn't going to be developing an Intel chipset. Their only option is to buy a chipset from someone other than Intel, which at this point means NVidia, SiS, or Via.

The only worthwhile chipset from Via is the PT890, which really sucks compared to everything else out there. From SiS, you've got the somewhat better 672 variations. These come with the Mirage 3 GPU integrated, which is still much worse than Intel's IGPs. That only leaves the NVidia chipsets, which are at least competitive.

However, switching would be a really stupid idea. Since Intel isn't giving out CSI chipset licenses, they'll have to switch back to Intel for Nehalem chipsets. At worst, they'd burn a lot of engineering hours for a product with a pretty short shelf life. At worst, they'd annoy Intel which is a flat out Bad Idea when your business model revolves around getting parts from them at cut-rate prices.
[Posted by: Cynic | Date: 07/30/08 08:39:02 PM]

[1-4]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Friday, November 21, 2008

2:29 pm | IN BRIEF: Qimonda Accuses Seagate, LSI of Patent Infringement. Qimonda Asks ITC to Investigate Alleged Patent Infringements by LSI, Seagate

6:05 am | Sales of Blu-Ray Disc Players Below Expectations, Movie Prices Should Get Cheaper – Sony. Sony Admits: High BD Movie Prices Curtail Sales of Blu-Ray Players

4:12 am | AMD to Release Quad-Core Processor for Notebooks in 2010. AMD’s “Champlain” CPU Set to Emerge in 2010

Thursday, November 20, 2008

3:21 pm | Foxconn Rumoured to Take Over Pegatron, Quit Channel Business. Foxconn May Sacrifice Channel Business for Contract Manufacturing Capacity Expansion

1:43 pm | Intel Plans to Release Discrete Larrabee Graphics Processors in 2009 or 2010. Intel Unsure When to Release Its Standalone Larrabee Graphics Chip

12:09 pm | S3 Graphics Reveals New-Generation Graphics Processor. S3 Unveils GPU with Built-In Audio Core, Starts to Sell Chrome 530 GT Graphics Card

8:29 am | Blu-Ray Disc Players’ Prices Fall Below $150. Relatively Inexpensive Blu-Ray Players Finally Emerge

4:24 am | JEDEC to Set Solid State Drive Standards in 2009. JEDEC Plans to Standardize SSDs Next Year

3:00 am | Elpida May Gain Manufacturing Capacity or May Slowdown Its Further Expansion. Elpida May Plan Surprising Acquisition of Powerchip or ProMOS