As we read over in one post at the
SiliconInvestor, AMD has recently shown the working prototype systems built on the new generation of AMD processors alongside with some other new achievements at a private meeting of the AMD investors.
They were showcasing two servers built with Sledgehammer processors (Opteron) and two workstations connected to them built on ClawHammer processors. They used 64bit Windows Server OS version for both and were running IIS and Terminal Server software. On the client systems they were running 64bit Internet Explorer. Also AMD demonstrated how well these systems coped with 32bit applications.
According to AMD officials, ClawHammer DP and SledgeHammer processors will use the same Socket 900+ and feature the same amount of HyperTransport (HT) channels: 3. As you remember, SledgeHammer is planned to come out in Q1 2003, and ClawHammer – in Q4 2002.
Also AMD claims that with the new solutions it will be much easier to build 4-way systems, as no chipset support will be required: you will only need to have extra HyperTransport channels laid out.
They also mentioned a new 32bit AMD processor on Thoroughbred core. AMD representative didn’t go deep into details, but mentioned that this CPU will work faster than Palomino with the same core clock frequency due to some changes in the processor core (I sincerely doubt this statement). The desktop version of this processor has already undergone all the tests and the launching date depends only on the company’s marketing department now.
Comments currently: 3
Discussion started: 10/23/07 07:27:27 AM
Latest comment: 10/23/07 08:38:31 AM
[1-3]
1.
why do amd keep messing about with their sockets, if you are smart stay with the same format looks like 45nm, and then 32nm... or maybe lower. I mean am2, am3, am4 am5...
Please, make a socket for 45nm, and 32nm or to the lowest point 26nm ? then re-think the heat-out of the cpus.
their new range still looks slow, and all over the place! it really hard to work out any logic to their plan when it comes to speed of their cpus, I am sure they could make a 3.5ghz chip or a killer quad.. this chip would be a best seller, for me their needs to be a total re-think, maybe I should run the company for them?
the one good thing they are cheap, on some cpus, if you buy at a later date, buying at the right time is so important, I want to buy another amd, but intel looks a lot faster maybe a quad6400 running at 3gz total power of12gz.
or a amd 6000, speed 3.2= 6.4 gz
time is money, and I need more speed.
[Posted by: red lice and beans | Date: 10/23/07 07:27:28 AM]
2.
3- core cpus, are a stop gap for amd, AND ARE A VERY-MISTAKE FOR AMD DO NOT BUY ONE!
BUY SAYING THIS, I WILL SAVE YOU ALL A LOT OF MONEY.
FACT
quad-core will walk all over them,and rule until six-core chip hit the market, with each core being able to be set to a diff/level of speed, a long way off, but it is comming, trust me.
[Posted by: red lice and beans | Date: 10/23/07 08:34:20 AM]
3.
3- core cpus, are a stop gap for amd, AND ARE A VERY-BIG-MISTAKE FOR AMD DO NOT BUY ONE!
BUY SAYING THIS, I WILL SAVE YOU ALL A LOT OF MONEY.
FACT
quad-core will walk all over them,and rule until six-core chip hit the market, with each core being able to be set to a diff/level of speed, a long way off, but it is comming, trust me.
[Posted by: red lice and beans | Date: 10/23/07 08:38:31 AM]
[1-3]