News

We continue our journey to the future of graphics cards and 3D technologies with more information about the upcoming graphics processors from ATI Technologies and NVIDIA. Additional details about the code-named R420 product appeared and we are going to share them with you.

Sources with knowledge of the matter revealed that the graphics chip known under the code-name R420 and developed under project-name Loki will be two times faster than the original RADEON 9800 PRO. As we revealed earlier, it will incorporate 110 to 150 million of transistors (see this news-story) and will support Pixel and Vertex Shaders 3.0. I expect the part to feature 8 rendering pipelines with 2 texture modules per each or 16 pipelines with 1 texture module per pipe. Its architecture will have much in common with the original R300 and R350/R360.

Talking about manufacturing technology used for the R420, our sources said that the graphics processor will be made using mature TSMC’s 0.15 micron fabrication process which seems to be enough for modern VPUs.

Currently it is unknown when the Loki R420 to be heaven-sent to the Earth, but in general it is expected to arrive in late 2003 or early 2004. We even can see some samples of R420 graphics cards this Fall, but definitely not massive commercial availability of such products since ATI Technologies needs a timeframe to sell its R360 code-named product.

Discussion

Comments currently: 6
Discussion started: 06/21/03 12:48:39 PM
Latest comment: 04/20/04 08:50:05 AM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-5]

1. 
Surely this must be a mistake. "Two times faster" means that the performance is 3:1, not 2:1. You don't mean that it is 200% faster, right?
[Posted by: Karl  | Date: 06/21/03 12:48:39 PM]

2. 
ATI sucks cocks in hell
[Posted by: sagitti  | Date: 08/15/03 04:56:45 AM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)

3. 
is it VPU or GPU?
[Posted by: SomeOne  | Date: 11/19/03 12:25:35 PM]

4. 
this car seems to be the top dog......but how much does it cost??
Im betting since the 9800pro is around 400, this card is going to be around $700, which for me isnt a problem, but im still not going to spend that much for a GPU. Graphics these days are way t much money and its getting rediculous.
[Posted by: bones  | Date: 03/18/04 06:30:09 AM]

5. 
Bones: The card will probably cost $499, as the Geforce FX 6800 Ultra costs $499. They wouldn't make it more expensive than the 6800U.
[Posted by: tony  | Date: 04/20/04 08:50:05 AM]

[1-5]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Saturday, November 7, 2009

3:28 pm | Electronic Book Industry Set to Explode in 2010 – Analysts. E-Book Industry Set to Raise – MIC

1:31 pm | Intel Plans “Fast” Transition to Next-Generation Atom Platform. Intel to Reveal More Details About Pine Trail Platform on December 21

11:27 am | Prices of SSDs Will Get Closer to Hard Drives in Three to Five Years – Chief Executive of OCZ. SSDs Set to Become Much More Affordable in the Future

Friday, November 6, 2009

11:56 am | Microsoft Windows 7 Appears to Be More Popular in Retail than Vista Back in 2007. First Week Windows 7 Sales Surpass Sales of Windows Vista in First Week – Research Firm

9:30 am | Elpida and ProMOS Sign “Technology-for-Capacity” Pact. Elpida to Outsource Production of DRAM to ProMOS