News

Sources familiar with the plans of ATI, graphics product group of Advanced Micro Devices, said this week that the company does have plans to conquer the market of high-end graphics cards again with the product code-named R680. Unfortunately, the new graphics board will not be released shortly from now and will also have a number of drawbacks.

The rumoured code-named ATI R680 graphics product does exist in the roadmap, sources confirmed. However, the R680 is not a high-performance single-chip graphics solution, but a dual-chip graphics board akin to Nvidia’s GeForce 7950 GX2 or ATI’s Rage Fury Maxx. One ATI R680 graphics card will carry two ATI RV670 graphics processing units (GPUs) with dedicated memory and connected using ATI CrossFire interface for multi-GPU solutions. Actual specifications are currently under consideration by both AMD and its partners among graphics cards makers.

Even though two of ATI R680 boards may provide the power of four ATI RV670 graphics processing engines to enthusiasts without budget constraints, one of such graphics cards may not become the best solution for those demanding high performance, but not willing to pay enormous sums. Performance of all multi-GPU solutions depends on drivers and in case the driver does not recognize an application, performance of a dual-, tripe- or quad-GPU graphics solution may be similar to a single-chip graphics card. Theoretically, ATI Catalyst driver developers may force so-called alternate frame rendering (AFR) multi-GPU rendering technology for all unknown applications for CrossFire configurations, but this may add lag effects in numerous games.

The code-named ATI R680 graphics card is currently set for introduction at Consumer Electronics Show in January, 2008. Since availability timeframe of the final product is currently unknown, AMD may reconsider announcement dates too. Actual product name is unclear as well.

Based on what is known about the code-named RV670 product, the new GPU features DirectX 10.1 capabilities, PCI Express 2.0, DisplayPort and double-precision floating point calculations. ATI RV670 is projected to deliver “R600 performance, better thermal & power”, according to AMD’s own documents. If the information is correct, two of such chips will deliver similar performance to ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT graphics cards in CrossFire mode. Even though in a number of cases two of such chips outperform Nvidia’s GeForce 8800 Ultra, which retails for $849, in many cases the high-performance single-chip product leaves the CrossFire tandem considerably behind, based on a review by X-bit labs.

Officials for graphics product group of AMD did not comment on the news-story.

Discussion

Comments currently: 11
Discussion started: 11/08/07 07:52:35 AM
Latest comment: 11/11/07 11:07:48 PM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-7]

1. 
8800Ultra are not >$800, or even >$700, please get your facts straight, unless your buybing from a brick and motor store (in which case >1000 would be correct.) please dont post misinfomation.


Besides we know that DAAMIT would fail before they even finialized details for the R680
[Posted by: Joz  | Date: 11/08/07 07:52:35 AM]
+ expand thread (2 answers)

2. 
Just visited Newegg, and there is an 8800Ultra for $590, so yes clearly $849 is a large overstatement.
[Posted by: James  | Date: 11/08/07 09:09:11 AM]

3. 
I stopped reading after the 2x r670 = 1 r680
how disapointing if this is true
Ati get a decent Gpu on the market please dont fool around and make something single gpu that takes the performancecrown back..
Amd should have never bought Ati ....
[Posted by: pip  | Date: 11/08/07 01:31:08 PM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)

4. 
What's even worse about the delay, is that the R680 will probably still carry a $800 price tag as earlier reported..... NO THANKS!

[Posted by: gamebro  | Date: 11/08/07 01:48:52 PM]

5. 
It's clear AMD is tanking and its dragging what was a fine company - ATI - with it.
[Posted by: Beholder  | Date: 11/08/07 05:16:29 PM]

6. 
When you look at the 7950 GX2 it doesn't seem like a bad idea. Of course then you realize before they did that Nvidia had SLI DRIVERS THAT WORKED!! True ATI has better driver support and stability than Nvidia in Windows Vista, but the fact remains that ATI dose not have good crossfire drivers. They still do not have 4x support for the dual 1950 Pro cards such as those developed by Sapphire. True they have open sources their Linux drivers and that MAY, POSSIBLY, help them iron out some crossfire bugs, but I think the Linux community just wants one device working first so I'm really not holding my breath on that.
[Posted by: Megamanx00  | Date: 11/09/07 09:34:39 AM]

7. 
What a load of ****.
Give us some single slot, single GPU solutions... not some fat ass graphics cards that consume so much power that your power company call you and asking if you're alive and aware of the huge power usage that's on par with a steelplant.
[Posted by: aha  | Date: 11/10/07 07:06:49 AM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)

[1-7]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Saturday, November 7, 2009

3:28 pm | Electronic Book Industry Set to Explode in 2010 – Analysts. E-Book Industry Set to Raise – MIC

1:31 pm | Intel Plans “Fast” Transition to Next-Generation Atom Platform. Intel to Reveal More Details About Pine Trail Platform on December 21

11:27 am | Prices of SSDs Will Get Closer to Hard Drives in Three to Five Years – Chief Executive of OCZ. SSDs Set to Become Much More Affordable in the Future

Friday, November 6, 2009

11:56 am | Microsoft Windows 7 Appears to Be More Popular in Retail than Vista Back in 2007. First Week Windows 7 Sales Surpass Sales of Windows Vista in First Week – Research Firm

9:30 am | Elpida and ProMOS Sign “Technology-for-Capacity” Pact. Elpida to Outsource Production of DRAM to ProMOS