As expected, ATI, graphics product group of Advanced Micro Devices, demonstrated its new ATI Radeon HD 3800 X2 graphics card at Consumer Electronics Show 2008. The new graphics card looks bulky, but it promises to demonstrate rather high performance.
ATI Radeon HD 3800 X2 graphics card is the first dual-chip graphics board from AMD’s graphics product group (former ATI Technologies) in many years. The first and the last time when ATI offered dual-chip ATI Rage Fury Maxx graphics card for gamers was back in 1999. That product was not a success, but AMD believes that its new Radeon HD 3800 X2 will face demand from enthusiasts.
The ATI Radeon HD 3800 X2 is based on two ATI Radeon HD 3870 (ATI RV670) graphics processors that work in multi-GPU ATI CrossFireX mode and carries 1GB of memory onboard. The solution has 640 stream processors in total and will fight against Nvidia’s GeForce 8800 Ultra and its successor. Each ATI Radeon HD 3800 X2 graphics accelerators have one ATI CrossFire connector, hence, can work in pairs, enabling 4-way ATI CrossFireX configuration, when four processors work in company to enable rapid rendering speed.

Check out ATI Radeon HD 3800 X2 at Consumer Electronics Show 2008 Gallery
Since all multi-GPU technologies rely on drivers to boost their performance, not all gaming applications will get performance advantage out of two or four chips. Only in the best case scenario all four graphics processing units (GPUs) will work efficiently, whereas in the worst case scenarios only one graphics chip will render the images.
Graphics product group of Advanced Micro Devices yet has to determine the final pricing of its dual-chip solution as well as exact clock-speeds before launching the solutions sometimes in February.
Comments currently:
10
Discussion started: 01/09/08 05:22:23 PM
Latest comment: 01/12/08 12:51:49 PM
Expand all threads |
Collapse all threads
[1-5]
1.
Oh boy. I hope for their sake, they manage to work wonders with their next driver releases otherwise this thing won't be worth it at all.
[
Posted by: Mr. BonBon

|
Date: 01/09/08 05:22:23 PM]
+ expand thread (4 answers)
- collapse thread
"In 3DMARK06 at 2560X1600 , benchmark scored 9573 ((SM2.0: 4494, SM3.0/HDR:4476). Lower resolution benchmark numbers are not mentioned in the original article".
http://my.ocworkbench.com/bbs/showthread.php?p=425431#post 425431
Sort of disapointing score with such a powerfull CPU. They better hope they get their drivers right this time.
[
Posted by: aka_evil_e

|
Date: 01/09/08 06:05:42 PM]
did you notice the resolution???
at 1600x1200, 4AA, 8AF the ULTRA gets 28xx with a slightly better CPU (source: tom's hardware charts)
this resolution has almost twice the amount of pixels, but the test was probably done without AA.
so im guessing its 20-30% better than the ultra.
[
Posted by: Som-Yun-Guy

|
Date: 01/10/08 12:11:18 AM]
Yes I did but every benchmark I look at is like an apples to oranges comparison. At the insane 2560x1600 with 4AA16AF the x2 gets 8153 (good scaling though the AA in and AF in the original is hard to understand) babel fish help on the same link.
I am estimating 15% higher now with your estimate on future driver releases. Still not good versus a card introduced almost a year ago. The R700 better bring the goods or they need to put more resources in drivers.
[
Posted by: aka_evil_e

|
Date: 01/10/08 09:06:28 PM]
Don't believe that much in 3DMarks, R600 lost every single benchmark across the board in every single resolution against the G80, yet R600 gets higher overall score, and don't ask me how did that happen or why !
[
Posted by: @DoUL

|
Date: 01/11/08 04:37:34 AM]
2.
It is bulky and power demand
[
Posted by: Marvic

|
Date: 01/09/08 07:03:53 PM]
3.
awesum!!
[
Posted by: nick

|
Date: 01/10/08 08:57:07 AM]
4.
I hope it totally beats the ultra and gives nvidia some competition. But it looks like the gx2 is going to be faster.
[
Posted by: Me

|
Date: 01/10/08 02:36:54 PM]
5.
Meh.
Crossfire is theoretically suppose to scale better. Now if a pair of these will run Crysis at 60fps with a min fps of 30 at everything set to max, then I'll be interested.
[
Posted by: Megamanx00

|
Date: 01/11/08 02:07:16 PM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)
- collapse thread
i am really astonished that ppl everywhere are setting crysis as the ultimate benchmark for whatever new GPU product out there. I think there were problems reported regarding crossfire not being supported by crysis, and bad gpu multi scaling with this game as well, moreover, their patches to improve performance are delayed ... etc..
Anyway, i think this card should be GREAT if it hit the market within the 400-440$ price range because then it will be competing with the rumored 9800GX2 and selling within the same price range.
Things to hate:
more delays for the R700, but i don't care actually, as long as there are realizable performance gains.
[
Posted by: why crysis?

|
Date: 01/12/08 12:51:49 PM]
[1-5]