News

Chief executive officer of Nvidia Corp. said during his keynote at Hot Chips conference that graphics processing units (GPUs) have excellent prospects for further performance growth. He also indicated that it makes no sense to integrate central processors and graphics chips since discrete processors have higher performance.

According to Mr. Huang, by 2015 graphics processing units will have computing power that is 570 times higher compared to performance of today’s GPUs. Meanwhile, central processing units (CPUs) will be only three times faster than today’s most powerful chips. Considering the  fact that modern graphics chips can offer about 1TFLOPs of computing power, then in 2015 they will offer whopping 570TFLOPs.

The prediction of Mr. Huang sharply contradicts with prediction of William Dally, chief scientist of Nvidia, who expects GPUs to have 20TFLOPs performance in 2015.

During question and answer section at the end of the speech, professor David Patterson of U.C. Berkeley asked if Mr. Huang had to do it over, would he still partition the CPU and GPU into separate chips. The answer Nvidia’s chief exec gave was that there were three constituents, the programmers, OEMs/ODMs, and chip designers, and each had differing requirements that make it difficult to bet on integrating new and very rapidly developing architectures into one device. By separating these functions, each can develop at its own pace and also provide the flexibility to address many market opportunities. Of course, Mr. Huang stressed that the GPU is evolving much faster than any other chip architecture.

The head of Nvidia also enthusiastically painted a picture of a world where the massive threading and computing capability of the GPU can provide many orders of magnitude performance increases over just the multi-core CPU alone.

Tags: Nvidia, Geforce, GPGPU

Discussion

Comments currently: 5
Discussion started: 08/26/09 02:06:38 PM
Latest comment: 10/23/09 08:25:23 AM
Expand all threads | Collapse all threads

[1-4]

1. 
Today's fancy math is 50 * 1?.? = 570X. Also 1.2^6 = 3X. These suite the fancying of performance.

They have no relationship for performance because of inefficient programing practices done by colleges and/or universities.

Using "smart" compilers and debuggers can help programmers create efficient programs. It depends on the programmer if he or she can write an efficient program then it makes the above figures look stupid and real world values look smarter.

I doubt having graphics chip being separate a good thing because integrated graphics is better for certain environments. Businesses does not care for graphic performance and for them a high end video card is a waste. If companies like AMD or Intel to include a graphics chip in the CPU, certain areas of computing can be improved. The FPU was a co-processor a long time ago, so I think the FPU will eventually be replaced by a GPU in the CPU.

I disagree that GPU are evolving faster than CPU. I have not seen any significant changes over the years for both GPU and CPU. The only changes that I seen in the GPU industry is the move from being a fixed specialized processor to a programmable specialized processor. This was predictable. Today the CPU industry is also predictable, so I have not dropped my jaw to the ground like I did in the 90s.
[Posted by: jmurbank  | Date: 08/26/09 02:06:38 PM]
+ expand thread (1 answer)

2. 
Is that a P.M.P.O or RMS XD
[Posted by: zaratustra06  | Date: 08/26/09 03:17:39 PM]

3. 
Nvidia Math at work.... tsk... tsk... tsk... I remember the dumb look on people when the NVidia Math was used for marketing the original XBox, same with the PS3's perofrmance...But to give Hwang the benefit of the doubt, Maybe his comparison chart was misunderstood by the Author of the article, maybe he was comparing a projected performance of GPU (in 2015) to a current CPU (2009). Who knows, maybe the CPU in question is an intel Atom.
[Posted by: goury  | Date: 08/27/09 06:44:28 PM]

4. 
Well, this is odd. What the article says and what I can interpret from the picture alone says 2 different things. The article states that GPU performance is expected to increase 570x over the next 6 years, while the picture states that CPU performance will only increase 3x over the next 6 years while if GPU and CPU were used together, overall processing power will increase 570x.

I'm seriously doubting that Mr. Huang implied that their GPUs will be processing at 570TFlop in 2015.

Please correct me if I'm misunderstanding.
[Posted by: Zshazz  | Date: 10/23/09 08:25:23 AM]

[1-4]

You must log in to add comments.

Forgot password? Registration

remember me



Related news

Latest News

Friday, December 4, 2009

11:22 pm | Intel’s Next-Generation Platform to Support GPGPU. Intel’s Graphics Cores Set to Support Video Encoding

9:36 am | Foxconn Electronics Acquires PC Manufacturing Plant from Dell. Hon Hai Takes Over Dell’s Polish Plant

4:31 am | 82% of Young Americans Are Gamers – Report. American Kids Use Up to Three Gaming Devices

Thursday, December 3, 2009

11:32 pm | Startup Launches Gboard: Keypad for Gmail. Startup Releases Keypad with Gmail Shortcuts

8:00 pm | ATIC Will Continue to Invest into Globalfoundries Despite Dubai’s Debt Problems - Analyst. Analyst: Dubai's Debt Crisis Will Not Impact AMD, Globalfoundries

4:05 pm | Sony PSPgo May Receive External UMD Reader from Logitech - Rumour. Sony’s New PSP May Receive Support for Older UMB-Based Games

3:02 pm | Corsair Launches Dominator GTX 2.25GHz Memory Modules. Corsair Unveils World’s Fastest Memory Modules

11:06 am | Online Game Sales to Leave Sales of Packaged Games in 2010 Behind – CEO of Electronic Arts. Digital Video Game Sales to Surpass Sales of Packaged Games